Lips, Sexy, Natalie Morales, Up Skirt, Photo, Sexual Assault, Rape Culture

Someone took an upskirt photo of actress Natalie Morales – Vox

Anyone who follows Ye Olde Blogge and there are about a 1,000 of ya out there following the events of the blog in one way or another, so anyone who follows the blog knows that I have a very radical position on sexual aggression, sexual harassment, and sexual assault: all men will transgress sexually in the right situation. We are genetically predisposed to commit sexual assault. It is as simple as that. The only thing that distinguishes one man from another is how many situations each is willing to commit sexual assault in.

Slutwalk London 2011 - 06
Confronting Rape Culture

Essentially, I’m saying that if we are to really reduce the incidents of sexual assault, then we’ll need to give women the benefit of the doubt. Currently, the response from the courts, police officers, neighbors, friends, and loved ones is we don’t want to wreck the life of a man by accusing him much less prosecuting him. Men get the benefit of the doubt. Given that men have a genetic predisposition to commit sexual assault, they exploit this generosity. They tend to treat each other generously when it comes to sexual assault. After all, there but the grace of god go I, amirite?

Up the Skirt of Natalie Morales

Now, we come with this story: some starlet, Natalie Morales, I’ve never heard of wore a dress with a “high-ass” slit — her words. A photographer went out of his way to get an “up skirt” photo of her pussy. My understanding is that American courts have ruled that if it is easily seen with the unaided eye, it is fair game to be photographed when in public. So, if I don’t need to go out of my way to look up your skirt or take a picture of your crotch, then I can do it. Fair, not fair, or otherwise.

There is some logic to this. If I look at you and with out craning my head and neck or going out of my way or making any other extra-ordinary effort, I can see the crotch of your underwear or your bra or your bellybutton or whatever other part I quite honestly am not interested in seeing, but am, if you know what I mean, then you can’t complain that I’m looking at it. You may not like the disgusting leer on my face, you know the one, the one that says I’m looking at nekkid lady parts, but if it is easily seen, then what’s the deal?

That’s not the case here. Regardless of the length of the slit in her dress, her pussy was not easily seen. The photographer had to go out of his way with malice aforethought to position his camera to get a picture up under her dress. It isn’t like she was getting out of a car and someone snapped her picture. She was walking down the street, hall, portico or whatever the fuck else celebrities walk down when they are at these highfalutin’ affairs. He had to go out of his way, take an unnatural position, have thought it out, have looked at her and said to himself, I bet if I were at this angle, I could get a picture of her pussy. He had to engage in that line of reasoning for the events to have transpired in the way they did.

“Wardrobe Malfunction”

DrunkInPublic
ALL Men, the Right Situation

Now, the media is calling it a wardrobe malfunction. It ain’t no motherfucking wardrobe malfunction. Her wardrobe functioned the way god intended it to function. It was this dickhead’s brain that malfunctioned. It was this dickhead that decided to answer the call of evolution and sexually violate her. It was this dickhead that decided to ignore the lessons his mama so surely or if she didn’t should’ve taught him about decency and social norms and managing your fucking impulses because we are not animals.

Sure, womens is pretty. Sure mens like to fuck. Sure, looking at bare nekkid pussies is stimulating, and, in some cases easy to do, all you have to do is dig a pit three meters deep, place a camera at the bottom of it angled at precisely 98°, place a $20.00 bill exactly where you want her stop and bend over, and presto viola and other bullshit, you’ve got a picture of her pussy with your $5,000.00 lens and $3,000.00 professional camera. But all is fair in the game of sexual exploitation and violence, amirite? It didn’t hurt her. It only took a second. It was just a bit of fun. If she didn’t want that picture taken, why’d she wear the high-ass slit in her dress?

The motherfucking camera asshat is a rapist. Let’s make no mistake about that. That was sexual assault. Premeditated malice aforethought sexual fucking assault.

But, there is another question here. I’ve gotten up and gotten dressed every day of my life for the past 50 odd years. The precise number depends on where you want to start the counter. And, no one has casually looked at me and seen my dick what I wasn’t trying to show it to them. No one. Even on those occasions when I left my fly down, no one has seen my dick. Even when they’ve seen my underwear through my fly did they see the outline of my dick, a gauzy filmy look at my dick through my gauzy filmy underwear. I don’t dress so that my dick can be visible to others without some tremendous effort to be gone through.

I look at the pictures of Natalie Morales — I can’t find any of the high-ass slit, but then again my internetting skills ain’t what they should be — and I can see the neckline of it, more like bellybutton or waistline of it. It looks like she probably had to wear “breast tape” to keep her tits covered by it. That’s her call. Wear the breast tape not wear the breast tape show her tits off to every casual passersby or not. I’m not judging her. And, she ain’t bitching about every person who looked at her and saw aureola, nipple, or other evidence of nipples bumping through the fabric or even about every leer and drool and snapping head turn that he attire surely caused.

If All You Got Is Eyes

Islamic Womenz AttireI ain’t blaming her for her fashion choices. It isn’t that if she hadn’t dressed in clothing that so readily suggested that it was about to fly off of her and reveal some tantalizing tidbit that we ain’t supposed to be seeing nudge, nudge, wink, wink, whiz, whiz, say no more! the pictures wouldn’t’ve been taken. If it weren’t a picture of her pussy, it would’ve been a picture of her ass, and if she’d been dressed in a full fucking burqa, it woulda been pictures of her eyes behind that grill that done it. If eyes is all you’ve got, eyes will work for you. Check the montage of burqa and hajib photos if you have any doubts that when you only got your eyes to work with, you make your eyes work for you.

Sex-Shaming

It ain’t her. It ain’t the fashion of the day. It is the sex-shaming of women. Because no matter how a woman dresses, a man will find it sexually stimulating and blame her for his desires and hate her because he now has to exert control over himself in order not to rape her.

Oh, yeah, here’s a great article from Vox sexplaining the whole goddamned sordid affair. I notice that no where in any of the coverage I’ve read is the photographer outed — it might damage his fucked up career — or are the pictures easily available. At least she is being protected from abuse, but he’s being enabled to continue sexually assaulting women with his camera.

Even Natalie Morales succumbs to this temptation by tweeting, What a disgusting, horrifying job you have. It ain’t his job; it’s him. He’s the disgusting horrifying human being for being in that position and succumbing to the pressures and situation that produces sexual assault in men. He’s a disgusting and horrifying human being for not having the insight into the situation and the wherewithal to resist it. Not all photographers are going out of their ways to take pussy pics. He is. Fuck him. Would you hire him to photograph your wedding?

Oh yeah, the fucking article. Get on wit yo bad self and read it already. I’m done here.

Someone took an upskirt photo of actress Natalie Morales. Her response is required reading.

Natalie Morales is unhappy with two different adversaries right now: the unnamed red-carpet photographer who angled their camera up her skirt in an attempt to take a picture of her vagina, and the press who’ve referred to the incident as a “wardrobe malfunction.”

Morales, who currently appears in the movie Battle of the Sexes, attended the film’s Los Angeles premiere on September 16 in a dress with a dramatic slit. “It’s a high-ass slit because I like the way my leg looked & I wanted to get me some of that Angie look,” Morales wrote on Twitter in a long thread on Monday, referring to Angelina Jolie’s famous slit dress at the 2013 Oscars, “but I wasn’t showing you my bits.”

Continue reading on Vox: Someone took an upskirt photo of actress Natalie Morales – Vox

8 comments

    1. Howdy Jad!

      Thank you for the kind words. I keep searching for the framing for this issue. I think that slowly but surely I’m getting to an accurate articulation of it.

      Huzzah!
      Jack

      PS I just posted about the gang rape of an AI-equipped sex doll. Would love to hear your take on the incident, sex dolls, etc.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. ” but he’s being enabled to continue sexually assaulting women with his camera.” yup and it ain’t gonna stop any time soon…… unless some constitutional miracle changes things and … or at least have men made responsible for their personal sexual responses …and stop blaming women for having vaginas and boobs. visible or otherwise. Men still have the responsibility to control themselves and stop blaming women for being women,

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s