
SUMMARY: In this post, we use Cliodynamics, which involves studying history through big data analysis, to explain how the wealth pump transfers wealth from the 90% to the top 10%. That’s called the wealth pump, and it signifies hard times ahead. We’ll look at two examples, Vivek Ramaswamy’s pump and dump scheme using an Alzheimer drug and subsidies for the fossil fuels industry. We’ll also look at how Biden’s IRA is stemming the flow of wealth by allowing us to negotiate Medicare drug prices.
KEYWORDS: Wealth inequality, wealth pump, Cliodynamics, big data, 90%, top 10%, Vivek Ramaswamy, Alzheimer’s drug scheme, fossil fuel subsidies, middle class, rich, Medicare, drug prices, wealth gap.
The last few weeks have been tough for the country and for me personally, but not all of the news has been bad for me or the country. That’s the problem when you’re a part-time blogger and a full-time citizen. You’ve got worries galore, but only a limited amount of time to blog in. Choices can be tough, especially with our news cycle is so overloaded with important stories.
Recently, we’ve been learning about Cliodynamics or using big data to study history by constructing databases of significant and consistent variables about various countries, nations, empires, cultures, and society and analyzing the patterns that result. It turns out, that works purty good.
Among the factors that portent doom for a society is the flow of wealth from the 90% to the 10%. Wealth moves upward by way of a mythical wealth pump. When that sucker’s moving full out, and all them dollars is being hoovered up by the 10%, things get bad, real bad, for the rest of us.
It buggar’s the question, how does wealth move from the 90% to the 10%? It turns out, the answer has been in the news these past few weeks. We’ll run through a couple of examples both helpful and hurtful:
Vivek Ramaswamy and his Alzheimer’s Grift took from the middle class
Before Ramaswamy became his super-hero alter- ego, Ramasmarmy, he was pharma-bro. But, instead of becoming a smirking convicted felon living on a paltry $2,500.00 a month in Queens, he became a smirking smarmy “wrapping” pres candidate, yo! Somehow Ramasmarmy dodged any kind of accountability for a little con he ran on America’s retirement funds, you know, the kind of accounts that Republicans want to turn your Social Security into?
Way back in ancient history times, like 2014, Ramasmarmy had the bright idea that he would buy the patents of failed but spectacular and consequential drugs from big pharma, hype them up, so the shares in his company would sky-rocket in anticipation of FDA approval for a miracle cure, and then sell his shares just before the bad news was released by the FDA. What in the nomenclature of illegal bad trading is called a pump and dump.
Smarmy buys the worthless patent for an Alzheimer drug, intepirdine, from GlaxoSmithKline for dirt cheap. It had already failed its FDA trials so badly that it was sent to remedial school and failed there, too. It failed so badly, it was forced to join the school-to-prison pipeline, but for drugs instead of Black people.
Smarmy’s company, Axovant, with all of eight employees including his mother and brother, publicized the stuffing out of the miracle drug that would revolutionize the treatment of dementia. The stock price soared all the way up to $200.00. After the sale of his shares and the revelation that the drug was a failure, the stock plunged to $0.40, taking millions in investments with it, including those of mom-and-pop investors and pension funds.
And that’s how it is done, brothers and sisters. That’s how the a child of upper middle class professional parents, vaults into the 10% by sucking cash out of the middle class. It also makes Smarmy one of the those overproduced elites, too.
Fossil Fuel subsidies Taking from the poor and giving to the Rich
Remember climate change? That bugabear that was going to scorch our forests and towns, worsen and enfrequenten our hurricanes, and produce heat domes to roast us in our cities? Whatever happened to that, right? The US gub’ment has been promising to lower subsidies for fossil fuels that are supposedly creating all of these mythical climate disasters just to placate the libel climate crybabies who hate us for our freedoms.
Turns out, it was all a lie. The gubment has been INCREASING fossil fuels subsidies — Thanks Sen. Manchin (D-Dirty Coal) — by impressive proportions. According to the IMF — like they can be believed because, you know, they hate us for our freedoms — we were subsidizing the oil and coal industry to the tune of a measly $500 billion dollars in 2020, and it only rose to a paltry $1.3 trillion in 2022. Like that’s going to make a difference to anyone. Freaking whiners. Oil company profits are in the 100’s of trillions of dollars, you think 1.3 trillion is gonna make a difference?
Of course, the IMF also reports the costs of not taxing consumption or making companies pay to clean up their environmental messes. Like any of that can be assessed. Seriously. These are job producers. They want to cripple our economy because they hate our freedoms. But, just to show how pathetic their arguments are, the IMF “claims” that in 2020 the US subsidized Manchin et al. to the tune of $5 trillion and that went up to $7 trillion in 2022.
That sound you’re hearing? My eyes rolling so far back in my head they might get stuck in my ass.
According to Peter Turchin all those trillions that we’re using to subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies with came from tax payers’ pockets through taxes. In other words, from the middle class. And, instead of spending it on things that would help us in some form or fashion, it gets spent on bloated CEO and upper management salaries.
Of course, these are just two of the ways in which the spigot overfilling the fat cats’ cups are open full tilt and their water is just spilling out of it while the rest of us wade around in water up to our knees as we wait for our turn — that will never come no matter what the Republicans promise — at the faucet.
Now, for the good news: the spigot can be opened completely, but it can also be closed, and we’ve seen that in the news recently, too.
Medicare negotiates drug prices slows the wealth pump
The much ballyhooed benefits of Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which was in itself a pared down version of his Build Back Better Act that he ran on, have started to be seen and felt by the middle class. In one of the many benefits for the average citizen, Medicare will now begin negotiating the price for ten — count ’em ten! — drugs like we are some kind of common socialized-medicine-having country.
They’re going after the ten drugs that together make up about 20% of all of Medicare Part D spending. You’ll remember that Part D pays for are self-administered, so the things you take everyday without assistance from a medical provider as opposed to Part B, which only covers the medications you get while seeing a medical type person. That 20% ain’t nothing to sneeze at neither. I mean it ain’t no $7 trillion dollars that Manchin and company are hoovering up, but it is $50 billion dollars put BACK in the pockets of average citizens and not flowing into the coffers of the 10%.
Of course, Big Pharma ain’t letting go of its billions in subsidies easily. They are suing the government claiming that while they can give Canada and Mexico and other countries negotiated low prices, it would be bad for US patients to do the same. If they can’t sell to you and me for $500.00 a month what they sell to a Canadian for $100.00, how are they ever going to be able to afford to fly Clarence Thomas around on private planes and luxury yachts to all expense paid exotic resort vacations? Hunh? Ever think of Clarence Thomas and his needs? What about McConnell? Just when he needs his Pharma Bros the most, you’re pulling the rug out from under HIM! You’ll leave him standing stiffly and silently at the podium for seconds at a time, when for just a small multi-billion dollar fee year-in-and-year-out, they might could cure it ten years after he died. What about that? Hunh?
So many of the provisions in the IRA will return money to the pockets of middle class Americans, slowing the wealth pump, and narrowing the wealth gap. The overproduced elites who are scrounging for grift are not going to sit still for it, though. They will fight this attempt to preserve our country as we know it tooth and nail even if it means transforming us into a single-party pseudo-democratic fascist oligarchy. They will make that sacrifice if it means some of them have a chance of becoming a 500 billionaire before the climate goes completely down the drain rendering all of their billions worthless.

If you saw any merit in the post, even just a little, consider doing one of the following:
- SHARE this post on your favorite social media platform or even your least favorite, re-blog it, tell a friend, family member, acquaintance, or complete stranger about it. Please.
- LIKE or RATE this post using the buttons before and after it. You don’t even need to be a card-carrying member of WordPress to rate it. You could do it right now and no one but me would know.
- COMMENT on the post letting me know what you think about our transfer of obscene wealth from the middle class to the 10%.
- FOLLOW the blog or join our email list so you’ll never miss one of our irregularly published posts!
Image Attribution
“His Cup Runneth Over” by dd-indy is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.







Hey Jack- Do you think Biden’s trips to Asia will do any good?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy James!
I guess it depends on what you mean by any good. Will it help improve his standing in the polls? Probably not. Will it help our relationships with Asian countries and strengthen our efforts against China? Probably.
I guess there’s a blog post in here somewhere: I’m not as worried about the 2024 election has I have been about the previous three. The GOP is showing their hand all across the country from school boards to state legislatures to judges at all levels to Congress. Impeaching Biden, government shutdown, abortion. All of those things will turn 60% of the public away from the GOP and 50+% of the electorate. They’ll win their gerrymanders and probably the Senate, but they’ll lose a lot of statewide elections, ballot measures, the House, and the Presidency.
They just won’t lose by large enough margins. That’s the big problem.
Huzzah!
Jon
LikeLike
I wish GOP voters still cared about things like honesty and corruption. Unfortunately, I don’t see the hijinks you describe hurting Vivek’s popularity with them at all, as long as he’s good at yelling conspiracy theories and insults.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Karolina!
I don’t see it hurting him either. In fact, it probably helps him with the MAGA base even though he directly, intentionally, and significantly hurts them through these practices. however, it likely hurts him with independent voters who will decide the 2024 election.
At this stage, I don’t see anyone other than Trump emerging from the primary. In fact, I suspect that many of the people running are doing so to ensure that the vote gets split marginalizing contenders like Pence, Christie, and Haley. The willingness of people to throw away their fortunes, reputations, and careers for Trump is truly astonishing.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it is. Also, ugh–just the thought of having to witness more campaigning by this guy next year….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Karolina!
It’s like I always say, every silver lining has a dark center. Luckily, Trump is going to be tied up by all of his court cases and expenses that he won’t have much time or money for actual campaigning. Unfortunately, it probably won’t hurt him to not be on the campaign trail.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love your saying–it sums up so much about life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So where do you see the role of increased interest rates in your scheme of things? When the government increases interest rates to “control inflation” who is getting hurt,and who is getting helped. Phrased differently, who is getting poorer and who is getting richer?
In order to be able to loan money, one must have money — definition: one must be rich to loan money to the poor and middle classes. Whether it be for buying a home, a car, or medical care, money is loaned at a eet interest rate. The borrower expects to pay for the pribilege of being able to use a product before they can afford to outright buy that product. They are already paying usurious prices for that product. To this add the price of interest on the loan, which raises the actual price one is paying for said product. It is called the price of doing business.
Now, without doing anything, the rising inflation rate brings a higher interest rste, and the agreed upon cost of doing business goes up, without the loan provider doing anything to earn it, and without the buyer doing anything to be charged more.
This creates free profits for the wealthy and extra unewrned costs for the buyer. Another win/!ose situation, just because the govetnment thinks thisc will help control inflation. Does this make sense?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Rawgod!
I see interest rates as being a small part of the overall picture. It directly affects the availability of money, but the amount that it affects business over individuals swamps the affect on individuals.
That raising interest rates helps control inflation is a “proven” fact. It does slow the rate of borrowing and spending by businesses, which, in turn, affects their ability to expand and raise prices. It is proven because it happens so regularly.
If anything, it slows the transfer of wealth upward because people are less likely to borrow. On the other hand, the variable interest rates, which individuals get suckered into, like with credit cards, go up increasing the wealth transfer. How much it affects the transfer, I don’t know. That’s a good question for someone like Peter Turchin to answer.
There are two large points here with the wealth pump:
(1) The transfer of wealth upwards goes largely unnoticed by the middle class.
(2) Government policy is the most effective way of stemming the flow and closing the wealth gap, especially through tax policy.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
The general problem with the middle class, in any country where it’s considered a “democracy”, is that there are, no even distribution of wealth, some of us are, richer than others, and, it’s, always, the middle class that gets, stuck, because, the top 2-percent, the wealthiest, don’t get affected by the increase of the taxes, and, the lower class, can’t even, pay for their, own ways, and, the most of the taxes are, therefore, paid for, by the, huge chunk of that, “bell-curve”, those of us, who make up the, majority of the populations, the middle class, and, no matter how anyone writes, rewrites that “equation”, it still will, never, change the fact, of how, the middle class are the ones, being impacted the most in the, economic, downturns, the, recessions that the countries is the world are, currently, cycling in, and, as inflations hit, life will get, harder still…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Taurus!
You are absolutely right about all of that. That is why it is imperative for the middle class to understand the wealth pump, its effects on economy and society, and elect office holders who will enact policies (largely through taxes) that will mitigate the flow and narrow the wealth gap.
During the Great Depression in the US, the elites were worried that a communist revolution would occur, and they would lose everything if it did. They came together, either explicitly or individually, to support FDR’s New Deal in order to allow wealth to remain in the middle class. As a result, the US had the highest tax rate of wealthy individuals and corporations in its history and the largest sustained period of growth (approximately 1945 – 1970).
Unfortunately, we are emotional decision-makers and are easily bought off by divisive culture war issues.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
It is hard to think of something to add to this, but once you understand the wealth pump, it gets easy to see all over the place, and how it defines what our political parties are for and against, and why one of them has to resort to the distractions of the culture wars.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Howdy Bob!
There is an interesting intersection between populist politics, the wealth pump, culture wars, the geography of culture, and the eleven regional cultures of Woodard. There is a reason that the parties and politicians change, but the politics stay largely the same. You know, that makes LBJ one of the most exceptional politicians in our history. He defied it all to become one of the most consequential American presidents by passing civil rights legislation and expanding the social safety net, forming a bookend with FDR on the progressive era.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, and a lot of ink has been spilled explaining, or trying to explain, how LBJ did it. In part, he was helped by the images on TV of the civil rights struggle and the Vietnam war (even though the war finally did him in).
We were talking recently about China and the problem of excess elite candidates. This item mentions that.
https://scitechdaily.com/chinas-ancient-echo-lessons-from-the-qing-dynastys-collapse-for-todays-world/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Yeah, the Qing Dynasty figured prominently in Turchin’s book as an example. Probably one of the best examples of what happens with an overproduction of elites.
It’s funny how LBJ knew what to do about civil rights. He knew to defy his upbringing and risk the wrath of the white racists. But, he couldn’t bring himself to not escalate the war. He had a choice there, too. He manufactured the Gulf of Tonkin Incident to justify the escalation. Johnson was clearly torn by the conflict but couldn’t figure a way to get out of it.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I knew a guy, long ago, who said he had an uncle who worked at Rand Corporation who told him that Rand had been running the scenarios and war games on Indochina since the end of WW2. When the French got kicked out they told the Eisenhower administration, the Kennedy administration, and the Johnson administration two things. One was that the Domino Theory was BS, and the other was that the region, especially Vietnam, was a Tar Baby and not to touch it, and once it was touched, to get loose fast. All that fell on deaf ears. Johnson was trapped between the Cold Warriors and a no-win situation. I’m reminded of a Zen koan: “Struggling with the koan is like swallowing a red-hot iron ball that won’t go up or down in your gullet. ”
Of course, the Pentagon Papers made clear how much of the Vietnam situation was being seen through false assumptions, rose colored glasses, and an inability to comprehend how our huge power could be defeated.
Which also puts to wonder how the Russians, after seeing what happened to us in Nam and Iraq, and them and us in Afghanistan still thought it a good idea to go into Ukraine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I guess starting a war is a lot like committing murder. You never think about the consequences of failure before you do it. Or, it’s like agreeing to be a Trump lawyer or aide, you always think you’re experience is going to be different; Trump will pay you and not throw you under the bus when it is convenient for him.
Behavioral economics suggests that when confronted with a a problem or task, most people will be influenced by their likelihood of success. If you assume the problem as being too difficulty, you’ll be less likely to attempt or make a serious attempt at it, quitting at the first opportunity. If you assume it is too easy, you may not begin or quit when it becomes boring. But, if you think it falls in that sweet spot of your abilities and desire for a challenge, you’ll give it a go and work at it.
Narcissists and other personality disorders suggest that they don’t see any problem as being outside of their ability to succeed. That most people who start major wars are personality disorders, suggests that they are not making accurate assessments of their situation. Perhaps this is one reason that Xi hasn’t invaded Taiwan, yet.
Other issues can interfere with the assessment of the likelihood of success, as apparently, happened for LBJ in Viet Nam.
The main conclusion that I come to from Putin’s foolish and futile war in Ukraine, is that war between developed economy countries is obsolete. It doesn’t gain you anything that diplomacy and trade couldn’t and at a much higher cost. Putin’s war is the one of the greatest wastes of human life, natural resources, and industrial output that we’ve seen since World War II. Even a success in Ukraine would not be worth the cost, which ultimately may be Putin’s continued occupation of his office.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m remembering an interview with an American veteran who had returned to Vietnam in which he described a conversation with a Viet Cong veteran who said to him that the “American War” was just an episode in a thousand year resistance to foreign invaders, the Chinese, Mongols, French, Japanese, French, etc. The history of Afghanistan is much the same.
I think part of the repeated tendency of the US getting in quagmires comes out of our success taking this territory from the Native Americans, that sense of Manifest Destiny, and assuming that the superior technology and wealth must always win. Then, there is the narcissistic refusal to admit defeat. Putin suffers from all those kinds of cognitive errors, especially the inevitability of empire.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
When I lived in Viet Nam, people would say that the American War wasn’t personal. They understood geopolitics and that they were just caught up in it. The French, however, was personal. They hated the French and there is still lingering resentment towards them. I always thought it was an interesting distinction that most of the people in a country could make.
We are definitely hurt by assumption that we are god’s chosen people and god loves us best.
With both gaslighting and narcissism (which the above is), reality has a way of biting you in the ass. We are seeing an erosion of support for Trump and Republicans. It is at the margins. The hardcore will be difficult to dissuade, but it is happening.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.”
― Philip K. Dick
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I think abortion is the prime example here. Reality is finally seeping through the cognitive dissonance, but not enough to actually make a difference.
Trump has saddled the GOP with a sizable noisy minority of the electorate as the base and one which alienates a majority of the rest of the electorate. That reality has also gotten through and accelerated their anti-democratic hopes and dreams.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think so. The fear that that reality will seep in enough to break the hold will drive the acceleration, the need to get the take over done before it is too late.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Germaine on two levels: pretty sure it was LBJ who told us if you convince the least amongst us one he perceives of being of even lesser value is picking his pocket he’ll do whatever you ask of him. Might be a bit of ying/yang going there, is moot as it is clear that that is what has been done: the least amongst us has been convinced everyone else is less than they and ‘we’ are trying to steal that from them
Annddd … we’re back to by-design bare-footed barely literate rubes sprawled drooling Pavlovianly across a ‘couch’ the back-seat out of a nineteen and sixty-nine Chevy Suburban drunk as a skunk on the Ambien, Prozac, Viagra and crotch-shots on the wall covering viewing device
[blindly following a charismatic ‘leader’ to suicide, dragging the rest of us with ’em] …
LikeLike