Summary: In part one of a two part series, the ways Trump and the Republican Party have utilized the Putin-esque “Firehose of Falsehoods” propaganda technique to erode trust in society is analyzed. By flooding the information landscape with overwhelming, contradictory messages, they create confusion and undermine the reliability of sources. This strategy leverages high-volume, multi-channel delivery and rapid, repetitive messaging to anchor false narratives in the minds of his followers and low information voters. As critical thinking diminishes, the illusion of truthiness prevails, leading to a fractured society where trust in information is nearly extinct. The consequences pose a significant threat to democracy itself.
Key Words: Trust Firehose of Falsehoods Disinformation Propaganda Social Media Critical Thinking Illusion of Truthiness Flood the Zone Useful Idiots Republican Party Democracy
Comment: Let us know what you think about the ways Trump and the Republican Party are manipulating information and its delivery to create the conditions for dismantling our democracy.
- The Firehose of Falsehoods
- High Volume and Multi-Channel Delivery
- Rapid, Continuous, and Repetitive Messaging
- Image Attribution
It is no secret that Trump has broken America. At the core of any functioning society lies a fundamental principle: trust. Trust serves as the social foundation built on a collective agreement regarding shared facts. This foundation is fragile and requires careful maintenance; once broken, restoring trust becomes a Himalayan task.
The Firehose of Falsehoods
Trump and the Republican Party have used the Putin-esque propaganda technique, the Firehose of Falsehoods, as a sledgehammer to destroy our foundation of trust. It is an extension of the old Soviet-era technique based on obfuscation and the creation of useful idiots who will continue spreading the message without realizing they are doing so. Putin adapted the technique to the chaotic modern media environment, exploiting social media platforms and the ever-fracturing media environment to his advantage.
The sheer volume of information bombarding us today is overwhelming. Gone are the days when we could rely on publishers to act as gatekeepers, ensuring accuracy and adherence to a shared reality. While that system left us vulnerable to manipulation, it also fostered a semblance of social cohesion.
Flooding the Zone with Shit
Nowadays, the gatekeepers have all been coopted, and Putin has taught the Republican Party to, as Steve Bannon so delicately put it, flood the zone with shit, so no one knows what is true, what is false, or what to believe. The Booberts, Mad Dog Greenes, Nancy Faces, Cancun Cruzes, Dumbervilles are happy little idiots who pop off with whatever floats to the top of the cesspool of their minds or whatever they read off of their Russian-supplied teleprompters. And just like the Soviets predicted, we are drowning in the effluent issuing forth from the various orifices of the Republican Party and their useful idiots.
Political scientist, Giorgio Bertolin, aptly described the Firehose of Falsehoods as entertaining, confusing, and overwhelming its audiences. We’ve all had these reactions as we’ve navigated the daily deluge of sewage spewing from MAGA propagandists as we spare with the trolls on our social media feeds, scratch our asses in collective confusion over whatever Trump is spouting today, and ultimately succumb to the mind-numbing volume of it all. But, whatever we do, trustworthy information drifts ever further from our grasps.
The Four Features of the Firehose of Falsehoods
In 2016, the Rand Corporation published an analysis of how Russia employs the Firehose of Falsehoods. It’s worth revisiting their findings, especially now that the Russians seem to have won yet another round by getting their boy back in office.
The report identifies four crucial features for the technique’s effectiveness: (1) high volume and multi-channel delivery, (2) rapid, continuous, and repetitive messaging, (3) a lack of commitment to objective reality, and (4) a lack of commitment to consistency. How accurately does that describe Trump? It’s as if, on the eighth day, god was bored and decided to create the perfect vehicle for the Firehose of Falsehoods.
Unfortunately, discussing all four features in the detail that they require makes the post TL;DR, so we’re doing the dreaded two parter. Look for part two, wherever you find quality snarky, sarcasticky, profaney political psychology blog posts.
High Volume and Multi-Channel Delivery
We all know that we rely on the beliefs and understandings of those around us to help us determine what is true. It’s part of our evolution. Our voluminous media environment has replaced what used to be the individuals around us—friends, neighbors, co-workers, family members, along with the three major broadcast networks and local newspapers.
The Overwhelming Information Landscape
This is perhaps the most salient point. When it was just your favorite drunk uncle blathering on about how the moon landing was faked, it was easy to ignore and shake your head in disbelief at how anyone could be so foolish. Now, though, with algorithms on Facebook, Xitter, and YouTube pushing conservative conspiracy theories, it becomes significantly harder to dismiss. These ideas start to take on a thin veneer of truthiness and knowing who or what to believe is further lost in miasma of the 24-hour “news” cycle.
Consider the advice we’re often given to determine the trustworthiness of information. First, look for multiple sources. Are several sites reporting the same thing? If so, it just might be true. The Russian troll farms have that covered. They flood every forum and social media platform with their content, even running their own “news” sites. So sure, you can find multiple accounts and websites all publishing the same garbage.
This is especially true for disinterested, disengaged, disenchanted voters, for whom the sheer number of arguments is far more important than accuracy, relevance, or quality. Surprisingly, when the volume of information is low, people tend to trust experts more; however, when the volume is high, we often trust Josephine Schlomo sitting on her toilet doing her own research on her phone and posting her conclusions to Xitter more than the experts. It’s how we ended up with RFK, Jr and a mass of people not vaccinating their children against deadly childhood diseases.
Second, check the reliability of the source. Here, we face two problems. First, the Russians and their American useful idiots publish very convincing, news-like websites and produce videos that mimic legitimate media, complete with all the bells and whistles. The second issue is that most American for-profit media often publish the Russian propaganda that Republicans repeat daily as if it were true. When elected officials say it, it must be news, right? Fact-checking is for the readers to worry about, right? Our once trustworthy gatekeepers of truth and agreed upon facts have walked off and left us on our own.
Third, representation matters. By producing a vast number of sock puppet accounts with using a random combination of demographic variables, they’re bound to connect with some group or another. We are all much more likely to believe someone we perceive as being like ourselves. The social media algorithms and seemingly infinite number of Russian trolls and their American useful idiots guarantee that all our zones will be flooded by Steve Bannon’s proverbial shit and truth and trust flushed away with it.
Creating an Illusion of Agreement
This portion of the Firehose of Falsehood works because it creates the illusion that everybody is saying it and even people like me are believing it. Size, as it turns out, does matter. The volume of disinformation effectively dilutes all other messages in the information space. It turns out to be very convincing.
This aspect of the Firehose of Falsehood works because it creates the illusion that everyone is saying it and that people like me are believing it. Size, it turns out, does matter. The volume of disinformation effectively dilutes all other messages in the information space, making it all the more convincing, and swamping any delusion we might have had to having some set of agreed-upon facts.
Rapid, Continuous, and Repetitive Messaging
Remember when an army helicopter collided with a commercial airliner over Washington, D.C., and Trump immediately blamed the crash on DEI before the cause was even known? Many on social media scratched their asses and wondered not only why their fingers stank but why he would make such a ludicrous claim, especially since it was quickly challenged and debunked by reporters on the scene. The Firehose of Falsehood explains the reason Trump would make the claim.
The Anchoring Effect in Information Processing
There’s an anchoring effect in information processing: the first information you receive about a topic often shapes your subsequent thoughts on it. People tend to believe the initial information over later, contradictory facts. In this case, right-wing propaganda outlets reported Trump’s DEI comments as factual, anchoring the beliefs of many of his followers regarding the crash. Whatever else it did for Trump — like maybe insulating him from blame? — it definitely degraded our ability to trust any reporting.
This incident illustrates how Trump acts as a one-person walking Russian troll farm. Propaganda techniques are not constrained by truth or reality, allowing the propagandist to spin events in their favor. Trump’s DEI comments are a prime example; he scapegoated DEI to justify his attacks on the U.S. government, using the tragedy as an opportunity to anchor his narrative.
Repetition and the Illusion of Truthiness
Repetition creates an illusion of truthiness. The more you hear something—no matter how absurd—the more likely you are to believe it. This is how urban legends proliferate, especially among those less interested in the subject. If you’re disengaged, you’re likely to accept seemingly plausible explanations without much critical thinking.
Critical thinking requires effort, so we often avoid it. By shifting the responsibility of fact-checking onto the information consumer rather than the reporter, our capacity for critical thinking is overloaded, ensuring that much of what we hear is accepted without scrutiny and greatly diminishing trust and truthfulness in our society.
Both of features work because they create an illusion of truthiness. Whatever is being said or presented seems true, so we stop thinking about it. Our current federal government is what happens when a sizable portion of the electorate quits thinking and is satisfied with what they’re being told. As Ben Franklin famously said, “It’s a republic, if you can keep it.” And, it looks like we’re not going to be able to keep it for much longer.
If you enjoyed this analysis of the first two crucial features of the Firehose of Falsehood propaganda technique, then consider doing one or all of the following:
- Share the blog post with someone you think would enjoy it.
- Like or Rate this post using the like button after the article or the rating stars above it.
- Comment on the post telling us what you think of Trump as a natural born walking talking firehose of falsehood
- Follow the blog or join our email list:
Image Attribution
This image was found on Leading in Limbo using a DuckDuckGo Creative Commons License search









Our major media and news organizations haven’t helped combat the Firehose with their long adherence to “both-sides-ism”, falling for what-about-ism, and treating content and claims as “controversial” instead of simply lies.
LikeLike
The for-profit press is a willing and knowing useful idiot in Firehose of Falsehood scheme. Seems to me that they have been for a long time.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are, and always have been complete suckers for trying to just keep up with the flood and getting lost in the details to the point of missing the context. Add to that the conflicts of interest of their owners and trying to appear “unbiased” and you get what we have.
LikeLike
It puts most reporters in a no-win situation. Most of them cannot leave their jobs and step into a profitable substack like Jim Acosta did. They’re stuck trying to appease their ownership and editors and do their jobs, which they think is reporting the news without bias.
With their news has a liberal bias line of attack — now updated to social media is suppressing their free speech — they’ve put the average reporter and newsroom in a bind, either report the ridiculous claims of the right as being on par with what the left is doing or suffer accusations of bias, find some minuscule scrap of semblance between the gross normative, ethical, and legal violations the right perpetrates on an hourly basis and something a liberal did sometime somewhere, or suffer accusations of bias. Unless or until they are willing to stand those accusations down, we’re stuck with a biased press that is useful idiot at best or collaborator at worst.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, that bind is real and been getting worse for a long time, The ownership of major outlets is part of the problem. If a media company is publicly traded, it is a t the mercy of the gamblers on Wall Street and activist share holders from all sides. And if it is privately held, then the conflicts of interest and/or ideology of the owner, be they a Murdoch or a Bezos.
LikeLike
Howdy Bob!
It’s a Hell of their own making, though. They don’t have to obey in advance. They know that. The reporters, editors, and publishers all know that. In fact they know they shouldn’t.
The biggest problem with independent news outlets is supporting them. I only got so much money for subscriptions and donations. I look at people like Joyce Vance and the #Sisters In Law podcast and think, those folks are set for life. They don’t need my money. Outfits like Crooks and Liars and Wonkette need our money, but I don’t think either one brings enough to the table to warrant it. Democracy Docket seems like one I’ll subscribe to, though. Every time I turn around there’s another must read substack from some fearless investigative journalist that I should support. I’m not sure how to navigate that thicket of deserving news reporters.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a bit baffled by it too, as I’m sure are many others. The for profit, advertising supported business model has always been a point of vulnerability for news media that try to appeal to a general audience. The usual exception has tended to be those with partisan and issue driven ones with crusading owner-editors, but they did not always tell the truth or tended to sensationalize (example: all of the Murdoch branches). They also have often relied more on subscriptions than advertising. Now, having owners who are both partisan and have huge conflicts of interest has only made it worse.
For well meaning and honest reporters, the frustration of being edited into compliance in advance or into slanted propaganda must be intense. But they also must be reluctant to join the horde of armature “influencers” and ranters, and themselves seek to find or create honest fact based outlets that can support the kind of serious work they long to do.
LikeLike
Control over the narrative is how Donny got where is and the media has been instrumental in passing it on to us peasants. ….good post chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is actually the one thing he’s good at. He’s the perfect FoF machine. He can spew more misinformation, disinformation, chaos, and crap than any man can.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
He could have made Goebbels a happy person. chuq
LikeLike
If Goebbels’ soul exists anywhere in this universe, they are extremely happy with the turn of events.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
His spirit is smiling. chuq
LikeLike