1. I Believe in Science
    1. Autism News: Object Personification
    2. Detecting Personality Disorders
    3. Stingless Bees Are People, Too
    4. Living Beings Emit Light, but not Auras
  2. In Politics: Gerrymandering
  3. Image Attribution

This week’s news has been dominated by the hideous shameful murder of Renee Nicole Macklin Good in Minneapolis by an ICE officer. The shooting and its aftermath have been covered wall-to-wall by news outlets and social media, so I don’t feel the need to include any of it here. I’m as outraged and saddened as everybody else and am heartened by seeing the largely peaceful protests across the country. Most of these pieces were gathered before the shooting.

I Believe in Science

I read a lot of science related articles. All my algorithms are accustomed to my interests and keep my recommendations well stocked and if that weren’t enough, I subscribe to several science-related email lists. So, a week of science articles was bound to happen.

Autism News: Object Personification

The title of this article just cracks me up, Object personification in autism: This paper will be very sad if you don’t read it. Then again, my super power is being easily amused. However, a good part of that easy amusement came from immediate recognition of myself in the title. I KNEW the article would be sad if I didn’t read it, even if I really didn’t believe it. Maybe it’s more that I believed it even if I knew it wasn’t true. Something like that. You know what I mean. I couldn’t quite shake the feeling that it wouldn’t be sad and that it wouldn’t hurt to read the article just be sure that the article wasn’t sad.

That nagging sense that something probably isn’t true, but just might be, so why not just be sure, really sounds like OCD to me. There are clear links — including genetic links — between mood disorders (especially bipolar, anxiety, and OCD), ADHD, autism, and schizophrenia. Don’t quote me on that because I could be conflating findings read while bouncing around in the back of a bus on my phone.

As a child, I was really bad about it. I literally personified everything and felt tremendous guilt if objects weren’t treated fairly or one was somehow singled out or criticized or was found wanting. I also found it greatly comforting. It was like they were friends or I was understood and accepted by them or something. It served a constructive purpose, too. As a teenager and young adult, I was able to transfer some of that empathy to real live human beings.

I thought I was the only one and was ashamed of it. Turns out, #ScienceFact, it is a “common” autistic trait and tends to continue later in life in autistic people than it does in the neuroconvergent. Who knew? Apparently, no one until now.

Detecting Personality Disorders

Since Trump blunder into all of our lives, understanding personality disorders has become something of a necessity, so articles about personality disorders catch my interest. I used to teach a personality psychology unit based on Snoop: What Your Stuff Says About You by Sam Gosling. It was fun, my students turned into Sherlock Holmes and wrote up a personality profile of a teacher by examining the conditions of their desk and personal areas of the classroom. The upshot is that almost anything you do unconsciously will reveal personality characteristics; the trick is understanding the correlation.

These good folks have examined text and verbal communications from thousands of people and found correlations between negative and self-referential language use and personality disorders. Ranging from everything from increased uses of “I” and “me” to more obscenities and angry and negative emotional words.

Of course, as we watch our democracy backslide into autocracy and Trump lead us down the path of wanton destruction of the climate and western liberal democracy world order, a little more anger and negative emotions are bound to slip into all of our communications, so there’s a word of caution for you.

The Way You Speak Can Signal Hidden Personality Disorders, Research Shows

Stingless Bees Are People, Too

At least in Peru, the stingless bee is a person. Okay, in some small parts of Peru — two municipalities, Satipo and Nauta in the Avireri Vraem Biosphere reserve — they have been given the right to exist and thrive in an environment that meets their needs free of pollution. In addition, the stingless bee has been named as an indigenous species to Peru that allows it specific protections there.

Stingless bee honey has amazing compounds such as antibacterial, antiviral, anti fungal, and anticancer applications. It has been used extensively by the indigenous human population.

I have a soft spot for social insects. They are amazing creatures.

Stingless bees from the Amazon granted legal rights in world first

Living Beings Emit Light, but not Auras

The experiments were on mice and leaves from two different plants, but there were undeniable findings of distinct measurable electromagnetic emissions. The emissions stopped when the mice were euthanized but their body temperature maintained. This light is too weak to be detected by the naked eye. Obv, right?

They’re calling it bio photons, but they don’t know how they’re made or why, so stay tuned.

We Emit a Visible Light That Vanishes When We Die, Surprising Study Says

In Politics: Gerrymandering

The GOP and Trump have made no secret that they want to choose their voters and everyone else’s, too, in order to win elections. The Supreme Court has sided with them by saying that political gerrymanders are okay and racial ones aren’t. Now, Republicans are saying that their racial gerrymanders aren’t really racial because of the correlation between Democratic voters and People of Color. It’s just a happy coincidence that political gerrymanders result in radically lower chances of electing People of Color.

Famously, Trump asked Texas Republicans to find him five more House seats similar to his ask of Georgia for 11,000 votes in 2020. Greg Abbott and the Texas legislature rushed to give him what he wanted. Then, Gavin Newsom, in California organized a referendum that would redistrict California so Democrats would net five seats nullifying Texas’ gains. Other states are considering gerrymandering their states to produce more seats for one party or the other.

Two gerrymandering cases made it to the Supreme Court. The Supremes overturned a lower court finding that found Texas’ gerrymandering was indeed racial and therefore illegal under Article 2 of the Voting Rights Act. They did it on the shadow docket in time for candidates to file under the new maps pretty much guaranteeing that the 2026 legislative elections would use those maps regardless of their legality.

Louisiana has a case before the Court that directly challenges Article 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Politico is of the opinion that they could rule on that case as early as today, Friday 9 January, or in June when they release their decisions as the end of the current session as they usually do. By releasing the decision in June, it will be too late to gerrymander legislative maps en masse.

The Court is likely to weaken if not gut the last vestige of the Voting Rights Act in June. Whatever happens, though, the gerrymandering of the maps before the 2026 elections will likely result in confusion and chaos in a variety of states, which is a feature of the plan, not a bug in the plan.

Image Attribution

This image was found on the USGS Bee Lab Flickr page using a Creative Commons search.