READING TIME: 5 minutes
SUMMARY: Did you know that Republicans are trying to rewrite the Constitution and that they are close to being able to call for a convention of states to do it with? Well, they are. They have 20 of the 34 states needed to start the convention. They have the legislation before 14 state legislatures this year. They’ve held three simulations of the convention. They are ready. Are Democrats? Can you call your state legislators and voice your opposition?
KEY WORDS: Constitution, Article V, Amendments, Convention of States, Republican Party, Project 2025, Equal Rights Amendment, States Rights, Balanced Budget, Term Limits
COMMENTS: We need to do correct some very big problems that our Constitution has left us with. How do you think we should change the Constitution to better protect our democracy?
The Republicans really are coming for our democracy. While Il Dunce takes a wrecking ball to our institutions and norms, the party is quietly preparing the way to create their very own Frankenstein monster by grafting Project 2025 onto our Constitution, transforming our democracy into a single-party pseudo-democratic minority-rule autocracy just like they have in Russia. And, if we aren’t prepared to stop them, we really will be living in the #GOPDystopia.
The Republican Party’s war on our way of life started long before Trump came along. He’s just a means to an end for them. It is why the tolerate his grift and corruption and his shambolic bumbling attempts “lead” and “govern..” They’ve been sitting on this egg like some mangey gamey mother hen since at least Reagan’s time. I’ll give them this much, they can play the long game. Something the Democrats simply can’t do.
Here’s the long and the short of it: The Republican Party are trying to create an Article V Convention of States to amend, i.e. rewrite, the Constitution. More about their exact plans in a moment, let’s look at Article V and the mechanics of amending the Constitution, first.
Amending the Constitution
Article V of the Constitution
Article V is the section of the Constitution that addresses the ways the document can be changed or amended. Those of us who can use Google know that there have been 27 amendments to Constitution already. The first ten are known as the Bill of Rights and were slapped on to the document at the very beginning, so the remaining seventeen have been added since then.
Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
The Equal Rights Amendment
We all remember the ERA, right? The Equal Rights Amendment that would make men and women equal in the eyes of the Constitution? Okay, I’m old. But, remembering the ERA is instructive because it illustrates just how difficult it is to amend the Constitution — there is some comfort in that.
Article V has two ginormous thresholds that have to be met. First, two-thirds of Congress or the states have to approve an amendment. There are 435 representatives in the House, so an amendment would need 290 votes in the House and sixty-six votes in the Senate. Nearly impossible in this modern era of politics. Or two-thirds of the states to call for a convention (two-thirds of 50 is 33.33 or 34, rounding up). Given the gerrymandering efforts of the Republicans to secure permanent majorities in state legislatures, this goal is a little easier met.
Second, three-fourths of the state legislatures or state conventions have to approve of the amendment. Three-fourths of fifty is thirty-eight. That’s a little harder to do.
The ERA was written in 1923! It made the two-thirds threshold in 1972, but it only did it with a deadline to reach the three-fourths requirement by 1979, later extended to 1982. It only missed that deadline by 38 years when the state legislatures of Virginia approved of it in 2020/
In spite of the difficulty, the Republicans think they have a real shot at ti… And they do.
The Convention of States Project
In 2013 Michael Farris and Robert Natelson hatched themselves an idea born of the grassroots Tea Party objection to America having a Black president. They would fix the US government by addressing three issues and started the Article V Convention of States Project. See if their three issues don’t sound familiar, i.e. like Project 2025, and like they could really warp the Constitution into something less than a liberal democracy:
- LIMITING FEDERAL POWER: The old bugabear of conservatives. The federal government is going to make us uphold the aspirations of the Constitution that all people are created equal! No conservative wants to treat People of Color or women as equals.
- FISCAL RESTRAINT: Another trope of the right. The tax and spend liberals with all their social safety nets are going to bankrupt us. Instead lets cut taxes, run the debt up to the troposphere, and transfer as much middle class wealth as possible tot he one percent before the next great recession hits. Because the Republicans have been the party of fiscal responsibility since Reagan. If you want trickle down economics to be mandated by the Constitution, you’re found your people.
- TERM LIMITS: I know term limits is a popular idea on the left and right because incumbency confers such a steep advantage on candidates, but really it is just shorthand for we want an electorate that doesn’t have to pay attention to what their elected officials are doing. Think about it like this way, would you have wanted Nancy Pelosi term limited out of the House? First elected in 1987, it took twenty years before she was made Speaker. We don’t need term limits, we need an involved electorate.
This is what they say they will limit the convention to, but (a) when the fuck was the last time a conservative ever let a promise, the truth, or a fact get between them and a goal that they had? Seriously, do you believe them? Hell no. And (b) once the convention gets started anyone can propose amendments. When Roe v. Wade was overturned, how long did it take for states to begin restricting abortions again? When the VRA was gutted, how long did it take them to start diluting the Black and Brown vote? You really think they aren’t prepared for this? They keep holding simulations of the convention like they were in the Model United Nations.
Kansas just became the twentieth state to pass the legislation calling for the Convention. It is coming before the Iowa legislature next. Let’s look at their map. Please note that this map was found using a Creative Commons search on Wikimedia. It wasn’t up to date, so I used my amazing tech skills to update it.

As can be seen, there have been some changes to the map. Unfortunately the legend didn’t come through:
- GREEN: The states that have passed the CoS resolution. They should number twenty.
- YELLOW: States that have passed it one chamber.
- BLUE: States that have legislation active this year.
- GRAY: States that have not passed or are not considering the resolution.
The keen observer will note some changes to the colors on the map. Some of the states have gone from BLUE (active legislation) to GRAY (not considering the resolution). They did not pass the legislation when it was before them. Some states have gone from YELLOW (passed in one chamber) to GRAY (not considering the resolution), the resolution is no longer valid after passing the chamber.YELLOW to BLUE, it lapsed from the last legislative session and it has been reintroduced. And from GREEN (passed the resolution) to GRAY (not considering the resolution), they rescended the resolution?
Those of us who can count will note that fifteen state legislatures are considering the resolution this session, and twenty plus fifteen is thirty-five which is one more than the magic number. Considering that its taken them thirteen years to get to twenty, it is unlikely that we’ll see a spat of passes this year. Also, some of those states have either Democratic majorities in one chamber or the other or a Democratic governor, so its unlikely to pass.
Contact Your State Legislators
While we are not in immediate danger right now, this is nothing to sleep on. It also is a huge wake up call for voting in your local elections, especially your state legislatures. And, if you live in a state that is currently colored BLUE or YELLOW call your state legislator and tell them to vote no on this resolution.
We also need to be thinking about which amendments we would like to make to the Constitution. It is clear that we’re going to need a big overhaul to our system that will explicitly codify norms and establish a truly independent investigatory body to enforce those newly codified norms. I’d love to hear what you think in the comments.
Image Attribution
This image was found on Nara & DVDs Public Domain Archive using a Creative Commons license search..






Thank you for reposting this, my friend. It is much appreciated.
Jack
LikeLike
This has long been a desire for the GOP for the Constitution stops them from doing all the things they desire and then along comes Donny and 2025….this is great info that everyone needs to know and fight. I agree that there are portions that need a change but not where the GOP wants them. I shall re-post this on IST…..thanx for the info. chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Chuq!
The revise the Constitution has just floated along out there at the edge of our perception. The biggest problem that the left has right now is that we don’t have the vision or the willingness to take chances. Say what you will about Heritage Foundation and other conservatives, they have vision and discipline to play the long game. The Convention of States is thirteen years old. Is there a liberal plan or organization or initiative that is thirteen years old? Maybe gun reform organizations, but really, is there anything equivalent to Redmap and their push for divisive cultural issues and hollowing out of our education system and stacking the courts with their judges? I don’t think so.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another one to watch is the Federalist Society…..they sneak the judge nominees in…..the Heritage needs to be reined in and soon…..chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those conservative think tanks are some of the most serious threats to our democracy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed. chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
This too is important, that if such a convention comes to pass, Democrats and anybody else opposing the changes GOP will be trying to make have to be there, fighting tooth and nail and jamming up the works, and demonstrating outside. The process is constitutional, so refusal to participate cannot de-legitimize the result. Those states that have not called for it have to be there with their own goals and agenda and proposals, ready to fight for what they are FOR, not just against what they are against.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
That’s exactly my point. The convention will likely come about one way or another, and Democrats, progressives, and liberals need to be ready. We need to have our proposals and items that we want to advocate for. We will also need to know how to gum up the works so that it is unworkable and results in nothing.
It will be state delegations, so we need to be thinking about who will actually go. It will change year to year depending on who has survived to that date. It will be a mess and chaotic, and the right is banking on chaos and confusion so that they can carry the day. We cannot let that happen.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
The work has to begin with how each state would choose it’s delegates, and that will have a good bit of variety. in any that elect delegates, that would be a place to put maximum effort.
LikeLike
Howdy Bob!
The red states already have plans to stack their delegations with Republicans. The Blue States can’t mess around with trying to have a balanced delegation or one that “looks” like the state population. We’ve got to have as much of a mission here as the Republicans have.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
A trouble is the at least many of the states have a procedure in this event written into their constitutions. IDK how many, but where it is there it went in a long time ago and is probably true for bot Blue and Red states.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I didn’t realize that any state constitutions had provisions for selecting delegates to a convention of states. I could see why you’d want it to be. How workable schemes originated in the 19th century would work in the 21st, but we may find out, but it is good to know. Since this project to convene a constitutional convention is over a decade old, I assume that all of the Red States have some kind of plan to do so. The question is do any of the Blue States.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
That might be a good question for Pro-Publica or Reveal or Mother Jones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would hope that some of those investigative reporters are thinking about the different ways that Trump could steal the election and destroy our democracy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so too, and I think they are to some extent, but there are so many ways.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, but forewarned is forearmed. It would seem that Democrats would be putting more effort into gaming this out and producing effective counter measures. I’ve heard various state governors say that they are and that they will have lawyers and other assets in place, but I don’t have a lot of confidence without more evidence that it is true.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, the SAVE Act seems likely to die in the Senate by Democrat Filibuster. Trump will try to do the worst parts by EO. Litigation will ensue.
One thing we can hope for is that more of the very smart, and angry, lawyers who have been and are being fired by or resigning from DOJ will join the fight in various ways, either working for state level projects or setting up their own public interest firms.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Those ex-DoJ lawyers already are making a difference. From defending Lemon in Minnesota to running for Congress (I forget who and which state), they are joining the fight. They are particularly potent allies to have since they know the law as well as they do. The sharpest questioners and most decisive folks in Congress seem to be the ex prosecutors.
I’ve seen too much on social media about calling senators to stop the SAVE Act, but the filibuster should be sufficient. We shouldn’t waste our time with it. It is hard enough to get people to call about things that will matter.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nobody understands the process of getting a witness, or appointee on the hot seat, to say or do the thing that will hurt them as well as a smart and experienced trial lawyer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Except for maybe Elizabeth Warren. She’s a lawyer, but never in court of law. The closest she came is testifying as an expert witness and submitting amicus briefs. But, man, do I ever love watching her in Senate hearings questioning some hapless muckety-muck and putting them through the ringer.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, yes, Professor Warren is a mind not to be messed with, and those who come to class unprepared are in trouble.
LikeLiked by 1 person