Reading time: 5 minutes
Summary: A classroom incident in South Korea illustrates how suppressed grievances suddenly cascade into overwhelming complaint once a single legitimate criticism breaks the dam. Trump’s MAGA supporters have been preference falsifying — publicly supporting policies they privately resented — because the intoxicating lie of racial and cultural superiority made the grift worth it. But Trump’s Iran war crimes and spiking gas prices may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, forcing MAGA to confront that they handed the treasury keys to the same robber barons they always feared. Whether this triggers a full preference cascade remains, per Timur Kuran, unknowable until it suddenly isn’t.
Key Words: Preference Falsification Preference Cascade Timur Kuran MAGA Trump Cognitive Dissonance Iran War Crimes Authoritarianism Robber Barons
Comment: Will the coming economic recession or depression be enough to break the connection between Trump and MAGA?
When I was a younger man in the late nineties and early oughts, I was the head of the ESL faculty at a prominent university in South Korea. It was the heyday of the ESL craze in Korea and also the pinnacle of anti-American sentiment there as well. One of the things I emphasized to my faculty was that we had to prove to our Korean students that we were teachers and that we knew how to teach. In Korean education, the teacher was always right, so asking a question meant that the teacher hadn’t explained something clearly. That was insulting to the teacher. The answers to test questions were right and wrong. You either knew it or you didn’t. The teacher was the font of all correct answers. You couldn’t do any of the fancy Western education stuff involving critical thinking or even group work. Should your class ever conclude that you didn’t know what you were doing as a teacher, that you were not a legitimate teacher, they would just ignore you. Worse, they would then complain to the administration.
One year I hired a young man with a PhD in ESL. PhDs were rare in Korea — they could teach stateside — so when one crossed your desk, you hired them. He had a Korean wife and two young children. It seemed like it could work out, but at the end of the second semester, he began to behave oddly. Very oddly. Oddly enough for me to worry about his mental health. One day I received an angry delegation of students from one of his classes. He had left the class without explanation and never returned. It was offensive to them. It wasn’t proper teaching.
When asked about it, he said one of his children was sick and he was needed at home. He was alarmed enough that he left without explaining to the class. That should’ve been the end of it. While I suspected that it wasn’t exactly true, it was a good enough cover story that it should’ve worked. The students in his class weren’t having it. They were demanding his dismissal. They went to my Korean faculty supervisor, and this teacher was dismissed.
When I met with my supervisor, the one complaint had blossomed into a litany of complaints. Most of them were minor infractions that if taken individually would not have been enough to warrant his dismissal. Up until his disappearing act, they were all tolerated by the class. Undoubtedly there was grumbling about unqualified English teachers. But, leaving without explanation in the middle of class was the straw that broke the camel’s back. When they met with the head of our department it all came pouring out. “He left in the middle of class!” “He was badly prepared for classes.” “He cussed in class one day!” “He came to class with greasy hair.” “He doesn’t dress fashionably.” “His smile is lopsided.” And, suddenly every little thing the class didn’t like about him or that he had done wrong came tumbling out until it formed an overwhelming tsunami of complaint.
Criticisms of Trump Mounting
That’s what is happening with many of Trump’s 2024 voters. They could take the tariffs because there were billions on the tariff shelf. They could take prices being up because good times were surely right around the corner just like in Trump 1.0. They could take going without their ACA insurance. The dismantling of the US government. Reduced funding for Medicaid. ICE atrocities in the streets. The blatant corruption. Murdering foreign fisher people on the high seas. But, once gas prices started going up and a real shooting war started, well, folks got worried. They got scared. Times started getting tough. On them.
We all know the Republican rule-of-thumb: shit ain’t real until I step in it on my own front stoop. The Cheneys were homophobes until Mary Cheney came out, got married, and shamed them all in 2012. Prime example. You see this happening over and over again on issue after issue. When it affects one of their own, then the government should do something about it.
The corollary is that Republican policies are supposed to hurt the Other, those people over there, the Communities of Color, the ones MAGA hates. When those policies hurt them, they can be dismayed, and cries of, “You’re hurting the wrong people,” echo throughout Red America.
Now, that one complaint against Trump was legitimate. He started foreign wars when he ran on keeping us out of wars. Once that criticism became acceptable to levy at him, the others could be, too.
Preference Falsification and Preference Cascade
This phenomenon has a name, preference cascade. It is a sudden shift in a group’s opinions or beliefs that occurs after dissatisfaction with a norm, belief, or policy is shown to be much more widely accepted than anyone thought. Public consensus on an issue seems to suddenly collapse, but in reality doubts existed in the minds of the pubic all along — they were simply lying to themselves and everyone else about what they believed.
A good example is marriage equality. Biden forced Obama into publicly proclaiming his support for marriage equality, and, then, suddenly, everyone was for it, even SCOTUS. Yes, really THAT SCOTUS.
Preference Falsification versus Cognitive Dissonance
The point is we lie to ourselves all the time about what we really believe, especially when there is tremendous peer pressure to do so. We may believe one thing, so we don’t stand out and buck the crowd, we keep it to ourselves and tell a public lie. If the lie persists or the pressure to conform is strong enough, we take it a step further and lie to ourselves again, telling ourselves that this time we really really really believe it. For all the world, it seems like we do.
It is similar to cognitive dissonance — the lie we tell ourselves when our actions don’t match our beliefs. A more modern term for it was coined by Timur Kuran, preference falsification. When social pressure is involved in changing our public-facing statements of what we believe, we have performed preference falsification. We’ve misrepresented what we truly think — whether we’re aware of it or not — for something that is socially acceptable. It is more than a little white lie, though. It is something that we will not divulge because of the consequences of defying the social pressure. The force is such that we feel the need to hide our real motivations and thoughts from others.
Examples: The Insurrection and the Big Lie
When it is the government or a political movement putting pressure on a populace to conform to ideological and policy beliefs, then you can have public performance of compliance. A good example is the 6 January Insurrection. We’ve gone from Trump has disqualified himself from participation in governance — corporations renounced him and quit contributing to his PACs, for example — to full corporate compliance and massive donations to his questionable funds like his inauguration and ballroom.
Another example is the Big Lie: the 2020 election was stolen from the rightful winner, Trump. It is a litmus test for participating in Republican politics. There is tremendous pressure to outwardly support the statement, and nominees for Senate-confirmed positions twist themselves into wriggling shivering quivering knots trying to communicate that they know Trump lost the election fair and square without actually saying he lost. Just as repeating the Big Lie is the entry ticket to suckling at the Trump grift teat, not explicitly disavowing it should be the exit ticket to confirmation.
Preference Falsification and MAGA
We can apply this concept to Trump’s 2024 support and MAGA. As much as I was convinced that Trump had explicitly cheated to win the 2024 election, I am now equally convinced that he did not. If he had, he would’ve won by 99% in all of the states. You know he couldn’t resist doing so, unless they were pulling a “keep him out of the room” thing like they did during the Iran War Crime combat search and rescue operations. But, for the narcissist, there can be no super secret jenius plan that is not blurted publicly What’s the point of being a jenius with super secret plans for world domination if no one knows about them? Am I right or am I right? I’m right, right?
Still, I think we can accept that seventy-seven million of our fellow Americans re-election the instigator of the 6 January Insurrection because they could not accept that the administration that engineered the soft economic landing after the #COVID19 pandemic could do it again in 2024. Seventy-seven million of us thought it was better to bet on the person that brought about the #COVID19 pandemic disaster, tried to destroy our democracy, actively assaulted any attempts at limiting climate change, and promoted chaos, racism, misogyny, and hatred at every opportunity. When you put it like that, maybe it is easier to believe that the muttering fokkers cheated.
MAGA believes that Trump’s touch can gild every steaming pile of shit with gold — sure, you’re still standing in a field of shit, but gilded shit beats admitting the truth. The whole self-deluding concept relies on LBJ’s piquant insight of convincing the lowest white person that they are better than the best Black person. When the best Black man moved into the White House with his brilliant wife and were so gracious and decent about it, well, that set off the self-destructive death wish of MAGA and that gilded field of shit went beyond being acceptable, it became necessary.
Trump’s excursion into war criming in Iran and spiking gas prices has awoken MAGA from their euphoric stupor to the nightmare of discovering that the thing they used to oppress Communities of Color, women, and anyone threatening their make-believe 1950s Mayberry illusion is really just the same robber barons who’ve been picking their pockets all along. They have handed the keys to the treasury to a cabal of global elitists who are just using it all to stuff their pockets with as much of their hard-earned tax dollars as they can. That realization is what preference cascades that unravel preference falsification are made of. Just ask Viktor Orbán.
The question is whether Trump’s Iran adventure — the war crimes, the saber rattling, the very real possibility of coming home in a flag-draped box — is the ESL teacher walking out of the classroom, causing the entire enterprise to be questioned. Are we standing at the cusp of the preference cascade that finally unmakes MAGA, or can their cognitive dissonance absorb this blow like it has so many others? Kuran’s unsettling answer is that nobody knows until they do. And then everybody knows all at once.
Image Attribution
This image was found on WikiMedia Commons and has a Creative Commons liscense.








I had a nice, long comment with the theme of permission to doubt or complain that MAGAs need to move into the cascade mode. I guess it took too long to write because when I hit “comment” something had “expired” and I got kicked out and it disappeared. WEIRD
It’s weird, but your comment didn’t disappear. I got it and responded. It was a good comment.
Jack
The strong MAGAs would/will need permission, social permission, to express any sense of betrayal by Trump. Such permission will not come from the known Trump haters, much as they (we?) may try to give it (Which has so far failed.) It has to come from the weak MAGAs and near MAGAs. Unlike those Korean students, they have no authority figure to whom to appeal and begin listing their grievances. That kind of permission begins with grousing and muttering, sour faced relatives and friends, with preachers (whether religious or podcasting bloviating past supporters of Trump ) suggesting that something doesn’t smell right, or favored celebrities and comedians making jokes at his expense. The current talk in right wing circles suspecting that the assassination attempt was faked is an example. It does not directly reference the current situation, but allows doubt. Then, there can come being able to change the TV channel when the BS comes on, or “forgetting” to faithfully follow and hang on his every social media post. That is the sort of thing that builds the critical mass of permission and slippage away, the emergence of the new norm.
I’m wonder how the firings of the cabinet secretaries who have spearheaded his policies might enter into this process. Does throwing them under the bus really shift the blame? Then, there is the sudden plague of scandal leading to MOC resignations. It does add weight to the general sense of corruption.
Ok, it showed up – sigh of relief
You hate to lose one, especially one you’ve put some thought into. They never come back quite the same when that happens.
Jack
Another odd thing: your posts and comments have stopped showing up in my notifications feed on Cabbages. That seems to have started at the same time the “rebog” button disappeared. And, weirdly, you’re not in my “Followed” list. But, I do still get the email notifications. Baffeling.
Howdy Bob!
I will regret forever trying to change the blog template. It seems to have caused a cascade of unintended consequences with settings on Ye Olde Blogge. I will double check my comments settings. The reblog button doesn’t seem to be recoverable, though, according to the “happiness” engineers at WP.
Blog On?
Jack
Howdy Bob!
Oh those terrible ether gnomes have been having some fun at your expense! Your comment came up just fine. I wish I had checked on it earlier so as to have saved you some grief. Speaking of permission structures, I was thinking of loosening the permissions needed for commenting on Ye Olde Blogge.
The corruption end of it may be the most crucial of it all. We’re out carefully counting our pennies so we can make our house payments and keep gas in the car, he’s out raking in billions “building” a ballroom, arc, and library. Meanwhile, he’s frittering away billions on committing war crimes in Iran. As we saw in Hungary and Viktor Orban, people turned when they realized the level of corruption and the cost. The bigger difference is that they had an opposition that they trusted to take the country back. Otherwise, they may have been angry, but stayed home on election day. They may have even marched and protested, but if you don’t think you’ve got a viable alternative to vote for, why vote at all?
MAGAcore will be hard to peal away from him. The edges, the Obama-Trump-Biden-Trump voters, the occasional low information voters can be gotten if they feel like there is a party and candidates worth voting for. I don’t know that that is the current iteration of the Democratic Party. Partly because I don’t see that anyone in the party has the “vision” and policies that would appeal to those folks. In fact, I don’t think there is anyone in the American political landscape that has a vision of our future. I think if there were, they would be starting a new party. They would be launching for the 2028 presidential and seeking to pull 2026 Congressional candidates along with them. You would see someone building something for the future. There just isn’t much even coming from the big named party leaders like Sanders, Warren, AOC, Newsom, Pritzker. I don’t see any of them really giving the leadership necessary for winning the moment.
Huzzah!
Jack
I don’t see a clear potential presidential candidate among the Democrats with the necessary vision among those being talked about, and nobody really emerging as such a leader of the party. We will need either (depending on the state of the economy) either an Obama or an FDR. Sanders, for all his obvious energy, will be vulnerable to another “So Old” attack. I do think that if the person needed is out there, we don’t see them yet, and probably won’t until primary season gets under way, like Obama, a young surprise with the vision, strategy, charisma, and style. As regards the midterms, the consistent feature of the successful Democrats in the special elections is their being their own person, not a party hack. That fits with the generally sour feelings among voters across the spectrum about both parties. With Trump not on the ballot, an independent attitude may count for more than adherence to a party platform.
Jack…they may be losing some confidence but I do not believe they will abandon the tenets he sets forth their hatred will outweigh their disappointment. chuq