
SUMMARY: In this blog post, the author discusses the psychological drivers behind last week’s news, including the death of Senator Feinstein, the UAW strike, and racism in America. The post explores the decline of mental acuity and physical ability that comes with aging, society’s struggle to address aging and mortality issues, and the politicization of dementia in politicians. It also delves into the UAW strike and the widening wealth gap, highlighting the transfer of middle-class income to the wealthy. The author concludes by acknowledging the prevalence of negative racial imagery in news media and systemic racism in institutions.
KEY WORDS: Psychology, News Analysis, Senator Diane Feinstein, UAW Strike, Racism in America, Aging and Mental Decline, Wealth Inequality, Wealth Pump, Middle-class Income, Negative Racial Imagery, and Systemic Racism
I know there are many many blogs and news media organizations that recount, recap, and review the week’s news out there already, so why should anyone read another one, and why am I doing one? We’ve already got these two must reads:
- SCRAPINGS OF THE DAY โ 09/29/23 on BobCabKing’s excellent ecclectic blog, Of Cabbages and Kings.
- Burr Demings’ weekly rundown of all things interesting and amusing on the web on his blog, Fair and Unbalanced.
- Feel free to link to any others that you frequent in the comments!
Here at Ye Olde Blogge, our niche is the intersection of psychology and politics and psychology and current events. When I was teaching high school psychology, I realized that the things I was teaching explained issues like the right’s love of guns, mass shootings, sexual assault, the growing divide in our politics, techniques to reconcile our differences, the rise of Trump, the irrationality of the rank and vile MAGA, the increasing inanity on the right in the rank and vile citizenry and the Freedumb Cockus. In fact, I felt like I could explain pert near everything using just a handful of the studies, findings, and theories I was teaching.
Nowadays, juggling my increasing work demands has become more challenging. With time constraints limiting my posts to just once a week, conducting the extensive research required for some of my more intriguing pieces has become almost impossible. It’s “amusing” that somehow the vast majority of the world can carry on, blissfully unaware, never having bothered to even read, much less rate, like, share, or even comment on my work. Of course, I don’t take it personally. Seriously, believe me when I say it doesn’t faze me at all when a post amasses over a hundred views, only to receive a mere three likes and four ratings. Nope, not a smidgen. It’s not like I fall asleep muttering disdainfully about the short passthrough times and the impersonality that the Internet has brought into all of our lives. However, I realized that I must adapt to this reality; I must devise an approach that allows me to publish twice a week, tackle current topics, and feed the psychology beast that animates my soul. Hence, the birth of the weekly news post. And boy, what a week for news it has been โ amirite or amirite? You know the answer, without a doubt!
So, in no particular order, here’s the news of the week with some psychology thrown in.
The Tragic End to Senator Diane Feinstein’s Incredible Career
Senator Feinstein died this week. Having worked geriatrics, it should have come as no surprise to anyone. You could literally see the decline in her. From her famous bouts of dementia to her use of a wheelchair, she was vanishing both physically and mentally right before our eyes.
Her situation casts some light on how we as a society address aging related and mortality issues. Spoiler alert: not well.
Mental acuity and physical ability decline with age. My hearing and eyesight are noticeably weaker than were just five years ago. My rate of hair loss has slowed, but aches and pains that had never been there before have increased. At the same time, none of us want to admit that we’re losing a step or two or dozen. That’s what makes Feinstein’s end so painful.
I find it unfortunate that one of the lasting memories I have of her involves a Senator Murray advising her to just say aye , as if she were Nancy stage whispering, ‘We’re doing everything we can, dear,’ to Regressive Ronnie all those years ago when Congress felt compelled to conceal his evident dementia.
Now, the dementia of our aging politician is used as a schadenfreude-filled political football to be kicked joyfully about to score cheap points that can be celebrated like a common Brandi Chasten. Republicans delight in flip-flopping between accusing Biden of being demented and an evil political mastermind out to destroy the world because he hates our freedoms. And, our political press just reports it like, “Meh, I guess it could be…”
Meanwhile, no one really mentions Trump’s advancing age, increasing weight, and obvious slowdown in what little mental ability he ever had. As I wrote back in 2020 when the left was all abuzz about Trump’s “conspicuous” mental decline in his man, woman, person, TV, camera moment, without careful testing, you can’t really determine the cause or severity of decline.
There are only two points to make about Feinstein’s passing:
FIRST, it is nothing short of a major miracle that the Republicans have agreed — see if they actually do it — to allow the Newsom appointee to replace her on the Judiciary Committee. I mean, he did very publicly vow to replace her with a black woman, and you know how nervous black women make all those stodgy old Republicans, right? Senator Collins might clutch her pearls and declare herself disturbed if it happens.
AND SECOND, can we all agree to remember Feinstein as the mighty hero trailblazer she was in the Senate and the only good thing to come out of Harvey Milk’s assassination?
The UAW Strike
While by this late date (Monday 2 October), the dueling Biden and Trump speeches at the UAW strike seems like a lifetime ago. Of course, Biden has given two more speeches since then and Trump did appear at his business fraud civil trial in New York, so you’ll be forgiven if you’ve already forgotten it and understood if you’re wondering why the hell I’ve still got this in here.
It’s the American political moment in a nutshell! On one side, Biden is pushing for union jobs through his economic legislation, which includes the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the CHIPS and Science Act. He talks about growing the American economy from the inside out, essentially aiming to expand the middle class by making it easier to earn a decent income. And let’s not forget how he openly sympathizes with union members, even joining the UAW on their picket lines and engaging in conversations with them.
Now, onto the other side of the coin. We have Trump, making appearances at non-union businesses, usually by invitation from the management. During these events, he tends to talk down to whoever the management could muster to attend, often encouraging them to carry fake “auto workers for Trump“ signs. It’s reminiscent of that one black guy, rumored to be paid, who stands behind Trump at rallies sporting a “Blacks for Trump” t-shirt.
You can easily gauge the significance of Michigan as a presidential battleground state by observing how shrill and transparent the lies become when Trump claims to be a pro-labor, pro-union president. It is quite amusing to witness the Republican Party and conservative media mock their demands for a “French” four-day work week and higher pay. It appears that sincerity may not be their strongest suit.
No one seems to remember that it was W’s Great Recession that required the auto unions to take huge cuts to benefits and pay increases to keep the industry afloat back in 2008 and 2009. No one seems to remember that in 2019, just before the pandemic shook the industry to its core, workers only received modest gains in their benefits package. No one seems to remember that CEO’s make a whopping 300 percent more than their average worker. Since 2019, CEO pay increased 40%, hourly worker pay, by less than 15% . And, when we go all the way back to 2008, worker pay has fallen by nearly 20%.
When you say it like that, anything will sound stupid, right? That’s why the conservatives don’t say it like that.
This is a GREAT example of the effects of the widening wealth gap and wide-open geyser of the wealth pump transferring middle class income to the 10%. Unless we can stop this madness, we are headed for disaster.
In this case, all that anti-union rhetoric spread to create “right-to-work” states back in the 70’s and ’80’s is coming home to roost. Trump is implying pretty directly that it is the union bosses that are corrupt and causing union jobs to provide less than a middle class income like the union bosses are some kind of common Jimmy Hoffa that should be disappeared into some concrete piling or foundation on some work site. Instead, the UAW ELECTED their president for the first time in 2021 like he was some common politician.
And one last point, remember all those run-the-protesters-down laws passed during the summer of Black Lives Matter? Five picketers were injured by a fleeing non-GM affiliated third-party employee at a Flint, Michigan plant. Violence is a contagion and stochastic terrorism is a thing. We’re watching it happen live right in front of us.
This strike is everything wrong in America and how it should be fixed writ small.
Racism in America
We all know that we here at Ye Olde Blogge love us some racism. We write about the racist bastards of the United Fucking States of Fucking America rat fucking the fuck out of our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and our institutions all the time. White people’s asses are held so extremely tightly that they can’t seem to unclinch enough to actually do anything to change it.
It comes as no surprise, then, that four out of five Black Americans see negative racial imagery portrayed in news media just like they’re some kind of common dentist preferring toothpaste or something.
This isn’t some longitudinal study, neither. This was a Pew study done last winter using focus groups and survey information. Remember, this is fifteen years into John Money Doesn’t Corrupt, Does It Clarence? Roberts post-racial America where we have achieved racial parity and Black people no longer need the protections of the Voting Rights Act. This is three years after the BLM summer of rioting torn, burning cities, and assaulted white people according to conservative media or BLM protests according to the rest of us.
Has our media unclinched its tightly held white ass? Not according to 63% of the respondents who feel like Black folks are more negtively represented in the news media than other communities of color.
What have we been saying? Systemic racism is geographical and passed on in our institutions? ‘Nuff said.
Wrapping Up
I had a slew of other things to write about, but I missed by Sunday deadline and am about to push it to Tuesday, so discretion is once again being the better part of valor and I’m ending it here. Besides, most of this news is stale and even if my hot take is warmer than lukewarm, it ain’t worth much at this late date. The good news is, I’ve got a model and I’m setting up for next Sunday.

If you enjoyed these “fresh” takes on some stale news, let me know by doing one or all of the following:
- SHARE this post on your favorite or not-so-favorite social media platform, tell you best or not-so-best friend. Whatever you do or don’t do, tell someone about it. For the love of god, let someone know that I’m alive and blogging, please!
- LIKE or RATE this blog post using the buttons at the top and bottom of the article.
- COMMENT on the post letting me know if you can even remember some of this news or if there are any updates on any of it — yes I know Gavin Newsom appointed Laphonza Butler to Feinstein’s seat.
- FOLLOW the blog or join our sprawling email list:
Image Attribution
“Sunday Newspaper” byย Georgie Pauwelsย is licensed underย CC BY 2.0.






We will miss Feinstein … I still miss Senator Byrd … both were rather advanced in age… both are now American Icons…
Because the UAW workers already live like kings, (earning 12 times the poverty rate) and because once they get their raises they will start living at the top of their earned income….like most everybody tries to do… and it will be no time at all before they are screaming about wanting even more (That is how Unions roll)—and because their greed will impact the costs of almost everything that other Americans have to have (Food, autos, everything) — I think it is high time the big auto companies ought to really consider shutting down their US operations and moving the whole thing to Mexico or somewhere else where people would really treasure and respect a good paying job—
And, to wrap things up— I believe that racism is ingrained into the dna of America and that nothing is ever going to happen to change it …period.. end of discussion…It is like gun violence … gun violence is also in the dna of America and nothing is ever going to change that either….barring mass human extinction …which will happen soon enough if something isn’t done to reign in the gun nuts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy John!
I think you are wrong about the UAW. Due to inflation, as stated, their real wages haulve declined by 19% since the GREAT RECESSION in 2008 when they agreed to cut wages and benefits to keep the auto makers in business while the CEO’s of the big three had increased by 40% and profits of the big three have increased by billions of dollars. Those union workers could not afford to live on their single incomes. Also, during the Trump era, they shut a plant down and moved to Mexico. A plant that was promised to remain here.
It isn’t the wages of workers that drives inflations. It is the wages of management. It isn’t the unrestrained greed of workers that has driven manufacturing from the US. It is the unrestrained greed of management and stock holders.
Culture changes slowly over generations. There is solid evidence that racism was on the decline before Trump. To change our culture takes concerted effort. We’ve put a lot of effort into making driving safer, reducing smoking, and stopping liter, for example. All three of those behaviors have declined. Currently, as a group, we are putting a lot of effort into increasing racism and gun violence. It is being promoted and condoned. It doesn’t have to be this way.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was a member of the UAW and when the chips were down they did absolutely nothing for me. I do not want to hear about auto workers not being able to live on their wages when their wages are among the highest in the world… even today –If they are hurting they are hurting because they are still trying to keep up with the joneses which is something they have always done. I have no sympathy for them at all. Besides, since those days I have become independent and need nothing from anyone to survive in any economic conditions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy John!
I guess the point about workers being able to live on their wages or not is moot. The point is they deserve a bigger share of the profits than they’re getting.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
They should be paid on the merit system and the merit system should be based on their sustained average level of productivity with bonuses for exceeding their average level for a pre-determined amount of time. But an across the board egregiously-high pay raise for doing nothing more than they have been doing all along? Out of the question.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a good start if it’s going to be e regular feature, but your pandeting for acclaim at the end kind of ruins it. We all know what to do.. i was going to reblog it till I got to that last part. I’m not going to ask my readers to lusten to the drivel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the mention, Jack. It is truly strange, though somehow (depressingly) unsurprising that the mainstream media get so worried when Biden has to manage his stutter in a sentence, but can barely even talk about Trump displaying his ignorance, confusion, and confabulation for all to see.
Diane Feinstein died with her boots on, showing up to vote on judicial appointments when most folks would gladly have stayed home in hospice care. If she had resigned, the Republicans would have blocked her replacement from the committee. She stayed in the fight, literally, to her last breath, rendering such a refusal so unseemly and mean spirited, so disrespectful, that they have to let her replacement take the seat on the committee.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Howdy Bob!
Long before the Republicans let it be known that they wouldn’t seat a replacement for her on the Judiciary Committee, there were concerns for her mental status and quiet requests for her to resign. When the writing was already on the wall, and she could’ve done it gracefully, she refused. It wasn’t until it was out there for all to see in all of its unmistakable glory that the Republicans started making political hay out of it.
Had she resigned 18 months ago, would they have seated her replacement? I don’t know. It just seems weird to have found a “bottom” for their willingness to degrade themselves with her death. Perhaps the shriveled mass that McConnell’s heart has become still has a beat or two left in it.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think all the very public celebration of her career and personality had something to do with it. Also, right now, the Senate is being (however briefly it turns out to be) bipartisan in contrast to the mess in the House. Maybe “adult” would be a better word there than “bipartisan”.
Now, the question of the week on The Hill will be whether the Democrats save McCarthy’s Speakership, knowing that it will likely guarantee that he will loose the primary next year, assuming that that isn’t already inevitable. Then, there’s this item: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/10/1/2196707/-Some-GOP-ers-Ponder-Expelling-Matt-Gaetz-for-Ethics-Violations-After-His-Failed-Shutdown-Scheme
LikeLiked by 2 people
Howdy Bob!
There is an old political maxim that says something like if you’re opponent is imploding, don’t get in the way. You just stand back and watch. The House Republicans are a circular firing squad. The Dems should let the House fire burn and run on it as an issue in 2024.
The biggest problem the Dems have in trying to save McCarthy is that he isn’t trustworthy. He may make a deal with them for their votes, but that doesn’t mean he’ll keep it. Still, it probably is the only way to keep the country from shutting down over endless budget fights. Dancing with the devil you know is better than dancing with one you don’t.
The Republicans shut down the government for 35 days when they controlled the House, Senate, and White House back in ’19, right? I mean, you just don’t know what they’ll do.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
At this point, the MAGAs in the House know they can’t trust McCarthy and are trying to take away his gavel. So, even if he survives that, he will not be able to pass anything with just GOP votes. He’ll be stuck with negotiating with the Democrats to get anything done, and they will be stuck with him, at least long enough to get a budget and money for Ukraine done.
If he does loose the speakership, the fight among the Republicans will be, I think, even worse than the one that got him the job. There may not be anybody on whom they can agree. Any “moderate” or “traditional” Republican seeking the job now knows the price of any promises to the MAGAs. And a MAGA Speaker would be just as hog tied. The bottom line looks like the GOP in the House simply can’t govern with such a small majority.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
What a difference nine hours makes. McCarthy is out. Dems decided not to back him. That’s a gamble. In the short-term it means that the budget and allocations are going to be difficult to pass. You gotta wonder how hard McCarthy worked to get Dem votes. He says he won’t run again. Maybe, like Boehner and Ryan, he’s had his fill. Then again, he’s been exceptionally bad at his job.
The House Republicans have 45 days to select a new Speaker and pass a budget. One that will also pass the Senate and be signed by the President. It is squarely on their shoulders.
The next 45 days will be a passion play about democratic governance and the necessity of compromise. It will be cast in stark relief. If the Freedom Caucus refuses to engage in democracy, it will be obvious, and, I think, voters will reject them, opting for moderates.
The best thing the Dems can do now is work with moderate Republicans to govern effectively so that both groups can run on, “See what we can do when we adhere to democratic principles, traditions, and norms.”
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
The new Acting Speaker will have his hands full. The Freedumb Caucus will likely be feeling full of themselves and try to dominate him, or, maybe kick him out too if that fails.
One thing that came out of the last go around was that the House rules do not require the Speaker to be a member. My fantasy non-partisan Speaker is Dolly Parton. I imagine her telling the members sweetly, but with Mountain Mama directness, to mind their manners and do their jobs like good boys and girls.
Here are a couple of items I have going out to my Indivisible group tonight:
Say it clear. Say it often. Keep saying it.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/10/2/2195246/-The-key-to-messaging-is-repetition-These-are-the-messages-Democrats-should-repeat-relentlessly?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web
A call to renew FDRโs Economic Bill Of Rights.
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/economic-bill-of-rights
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Smith’s point about Dem messaging is on point. It has been the forever problem with the Dems, partly because they are a big tent coalition party and adhere to democratic values and support individual freedoms of expressions, even for their own members. It might not be as electorally effective as the propagandistic lies repeated endlessly by the GOP, but it is closer to democracy. However, not all messaging, as Smith points out, need be lies. He makes some useful suggestions. Hopefully, they will employ them.
There is some evidence that they are. Biden has exercised some message discipline in the 2020 and 2022 elections. He has started the 2024 campaign with more of the same.
It would be he epitome of the GOP’s unwillingness to actually govern as a democratic entity if they selected a non-House member as Speaker. Reporting is that Trump is “open” to it. Given that the Freedumb Caucus’ main raison d’etre is to poison government, there is no real hope for anyone to move the House over.
If McCarthy would’ve been a Nancy Pelosi, he would’ve impeached Trump in 2022 and forged a coalition with moderate Republicans and Democrats to keep the government working and effective. It was his only move to actually be an effective Speaker and last longer than six Liz Tuss’ in office.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
If ever there was a better lesson that in the situation of divided government, the only path to getting anything important done is in making the bipartisan deals, ugly as they often are. It is only made more critical when the majority party in each of the two chambers has such a tiny edge that a few recalcitrant members can stymie action (example, Joe Manchin). And, all the more so when a faction opposes any deal with the other side.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
The obvious solution to the radical fringe is to move towards the center. Right now, our politics are too sportsified to be workable. It works great for the Super Bowl and stuff, but it doesn’t make for good government.
Here’s hoping that an improving economy and the complete meltdown of the Republican Party as Trump goes down bellowing seals the 2024 election for the Dems.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, the Republicans are certainly doing a lot to make the case that they need to go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All the hand wringing about the 2024 election is a bit much. It is still 2023 and more than a year out. Very little of what is happening now will influence or effect the outcome of the election.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite so. Making predictions this far out is great copy for the professional prophets class, but reality is full of surprises.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
The downfall of FiveThirtyEight has been sad, but one of the things that I’ve learned from them is that the polls this far out are not predictive and should be ignored. Part of their downfall was their inability to resist clickbaiting these early polls.
Reality is, indeed, full of surprises. The Hamas thing being a black swan that, apparently, no one predicted. Given that it comes on the heels of Biden having swapped, what, $6 billion for American prisoners, even though it is being dolled out by our ally, Kuwait, it will make fertile political fodder for the Republicans. And, it will compete with Ukraine for funding and military gear even though Israel has a bloated military nearly as overfunded as our own.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Republicans are already jumping on the Iran deal as the cause of the Hamas thing, which is ridiculous, since Hamas has obviously been build up for it for years. And listening to the verbiage about “terrorists”, I’ve had the reminder that one man’s terrorist is always another man’s freedom fighter running in my gaslighting resistance circuit all day. Neither side in this situation ever seems to be able to connect the other side’s actions with their own behavior. It’s been a game of “He hit me first.” from the beginning, with each side placing the beginning differently, in this case, possibly all the way back to the Battle of Jericho. Most wars are like that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There really can be no winner in the Israeli-Hamas conflict other than Netanyahu and whoever the Hamas leadership is. The peoples of the region are suffering greatly with more to come.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
True.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
The accusation was just too easy to resist. It’s ridiculous as you’ve said. Now, Hamas is threatening to kill hostages if Israel strikes Palestinian civilians without warning. It strikes me that this threat supports the idea that a lot of what drives Hamas and the PLO before was the treatment of Palestinians by the Israelis.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s what has driven them since 1948. All those “refugee camps” that have become cities date from then. There was some serious ethnic cleansing in the formation of the modern state of Israel. Several members of the current coalition really do hold the position that there is no such thing as a “Palestinian”, that they are just a bunch of Arabs who happen to be squatting on The Promised Land for a couple of thousand years, and really ought to just leave.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
The media portrayal of the conflict is so slanted in the Israeli direction. It really shows how much influence the media has in our perceptions. The hopes for a peaceful coexistence with Palestinians died with Yitzak Rabin in ’95. It shows how the scuttling of good governance will radicalize a country and promote dishonest anti-democratic figures like Netanyahu.
The religious view that there is a millennia old historical claim to the land by the Jews shows us the danger of mixing religion and government.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
Israel had some chance of solving the problem as long as they insisted on being an ethnic culture with a secular state. Once the religious ultra conservatives got significant power, that was lost.
We also can’t ignore the role of American Christians with end times dreams in the whole mess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I had heard in a news report that one of the driving factors in Hamas’ decision to undertake such an attack is the feeling that they were no longer relevant in the Muslim-Arab world. It is true. Israel have made them a net negative for any sponsoring state. They’ve ensured that the Palestinian territories will only be dependent, begging for handouts. There are few states that would take on the seventy year burden of providing for five million more people than their population, especially when there is no end in sight.
Iran helps them because it is in their geopolitical interest to do so, which means that their client states and groups will help them. Jordan may have quietly minimized the assistance that it provides. I don’t know that for sure. The king of Jordan had once been one of their most generous benefactors. The Gulf States are not providing for them like they had been thirty years ago.
The current state of the Palestinians is misery without end. It is shameful, but there is little that anyone can do to change the situation, especially if when Israel’s greatest benefactor has such an emotionally vested interest in helping them persecute the Palestinians.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
People who have nothing left to lose eventually get to thinking they might as well make as much noise and mess as possible on their way out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m reminded that there is a thin line separating murder and suicide. More rational actors ought not to participate in one least it become the other.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed. Unfortunately, such rationality is hard to find in that Gaza situation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The message to McCarthy and his successor as Speaker from both sides of the isle seems to be, “Bust a deal, face the wheel.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
McCarthy was really his own worst enemy in this whole thing. He was too openly hungering after the office, which pushed him into bargaining with the Freedom Caucus and signaled to them that they could drive a hard bargain. Then he caved to the good government side who wanted to keep the government open and signed off on the continuing resolution. Last spring, he caved to the good government folks and signed off on the deal that would supposedly have prevented government shutdowns. Then, he insulted Dems publicly when he needed their votes to keep him as Speaker.
He’s the perfect politician for our age: all tactics, no strategy; all soundbites, no policy; all snark and smarm; no political maneuvering. Apparently, his idea of Real Politiks was to point out that the Freedom Caucus would be voting with Democrats to keep him out of office.
In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, “What a maroon!”
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. It is also one of the fruits of gerrymandering. As someone pointed out, the entire Freedumb Caucus have safe districts and only need fear a primary challenge from someone more madly MAGA than them. McCarthy was in the same position, but in a district that has been getting a bit more blueish. Of course, now he should probably go get a job a a think tank or lobbyist shop and not run for reelection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I guess that really does make them narcissists. Only a narcissist would shrug their shoulders and think, well, my re-election is safe, I’m going to play brinkmanship and be a hero.
That is something that I appreciate about the Dems. They tolerate Joe Manchin and other centrists better than the Republicans do.
McCarthy should follow in Boehner and Ryan’s footsteps and get out, but he was never as bright as either of them. We get the politicians we elect, right?
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Every interview I hear (not many, but a few) of Freedumb Caucus members does sound classically narcissistic, all “no compromise”, “all or nothing”, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They aren’t governing so much as indulging their narcissism. I’ve heard other people describe what they’re doing as cosplaying, grandstanding, pandering. Whatever they’re doing it isn’t governing.
It has been nice to see some Republicans seem to turn on Matt Gaetz.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is method to their madness. First, you demand something that is red meat for the base, but that has no chance of passage. Then you get to play the victims of the corrupt system, which is more meat for the base.
I get very weary of self-proclaimed “fiscally responsible” conservatives who can only see problems on the spending side of the ledger.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
That is exactly right. They cycle through their routine like a touring comic. The same tired jokes told in the same way but applied to whatever events of the day. In the end, you get a laugh, but you also are shifting the wealth of the nation to the 10% leaving your constituents to live in misery. The red states are such a mess right now. It is that mess that Republicans have made that is fueling the anger and resentment that is driving MAGA. It is almost like it is planned, which brings us full circle back to Leonard Leo.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, and Harlan Crow is behind the No Labels Party.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I wonder who is behind RFK, Jr? Truthfully, I haven’t paid close enough attention to his campaign to figure it out.
Jill Stein’s spoiler campaign worked out so well that “they” have been fishing around for another ever since. No Labels and Joe Manchin have the best chance of really muddying the waters enough to allow Trump to slip back in, but really any Republican will do.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good question, although RFK,Jr. has been running what I have the impression is a fairly low budget campaign. The pundits seem to be trending toward the opinion that he will pull more from the “never again Trump” side.
Joe Manchin might have to switch parties to get reelected in WV.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Joe Manchin is not going to be re-elcted in WV whether he is Democrat or Republican. He knows that. His identity is too wrapped up in being a Democrat for him to easily switch parties. His ego and pocket book are too wrapped up in him holding public office for him to quit now. If he runs (Spoiler: He’ll run) on the No Labels Party ticket, he’ll do it as a grift to set himself up as fossil fuel lobbyist.
The people urging him to run, though, are Republicans, thinking that his Kennedy name will pull low-information Democratic voters. They’ll be wrong. The low-information crowd will be all Biden or Trump. They’re hoping for a pervasive atmosphere of both sides have failed, so elect someone new, to affect the smarmy low-information I’m-voting-because-I’m-so-politicly-active-and-informed Tik-Tok bandwagon voter. They may not be wrong there. Will it be enough to hurt or help either side? Who knows, but doubtful.
The real damage could come from Manchin and the No Labels Party. However, most Democratic voters will be better informed. The biggest thing Manchin might do is pull the Never-Trump Republican voter like Cassidy Hutchinson.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think at this point most Democrats, and certainly the vast majority of Boomer Democrats know Junior is not his daddy or his uncle, not even close. And he gets farther and farther out in conspiracy land. I don’t know his age off hand, but I could begin to wonder about early onset Alzheimer’s.
So, one third party, one (maybe more to come) independent runner, and several Republicans running who can’t figure out how to run against someone without actually being against him. And an entire year until the election. High Ho here we go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Manchin is 77 years old. It’s his last hurrah no matter what. I know he is heavily invested in “providing” for his children, i.e. passing the grift on to them and setting them up to reap the benefits of the wealth pump and insulate them against any difficulties that might result. The only way he can do that is to maintain his position as advocate for coal. Unfortunately, once out of office, he won’t be able to steer as much money to his son’s ill-advised coal-business model.
We’re in for a helluva year as the desperate take even more desperate measures to try to maintain their positions and avoid accountability for their crimes and misdeeds.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
We live in interesting times.
LikeLiked by 1 person