
SUMMARY: This post explores status quo bias in the context of politics, using behavioral economics to demonstrate individuals’ reluctance to embrace change. It discusses the incumbent advantage and offers insights into making change more appealing than the status quo. By analyzing specific examples related to immigration, the economy, and partisan conflict, the post highlights the efforts to create a perception of chaos and hopelessness. Ultimately, it emphasizes how these strategies aim to sway voters’ perceptions of the current state of affairs, presenting change as the better choice. The analysis encourages readers to consider and share the insights provided, shedding light on political maneuvers to shape public opinion.
KEY WORDS: status quo bias, behavioral economics, politics, change, incumbent advantage, immigration, economy, partisan conflict, perception, public opinion
COMMENTS: How have Republicans made government less effective in your state or locality? What other examples of Republican failure to govern have you observed? I’d love to discuss them in the comments!
Behavioral Economics and the Subconscious Struggle with Change
Status quo bias bias refers to our inclination to maintain the current state of affairs, leading to a reluctance to embrace change. This bias is in line with findings in behavioral economics, which suggest that individuals are averse to taking risks unless it is to avoid a certain loss. Departing from familiar routines or practices is often perceived as risky, evoking discomfort in individuals. Regardless of the context, the existing status quo is perceived as a safety net that has ensured survival, even in challenging circumstances. Initiating change, regardless of the nature of the change, is viewed as jeopardizing the one stable element that has sustained one’s well-being. Consequently, the fear of losing this stability often outweighs the potential benefits of change.
This subconscious struggle occurs whenever we contemplate making a significant change.
Status Quo Bias Explains the Incumbent Advantage
In politics, it explains the incumbent advantage, shedding light on the formidable challenge faced by contenders such as Mondale, Dole, Kerry, and Romney in their bids for the presidency. Despite identifiable weaknesses in each of the incumbents they ran against, they all still faced long odds. Defeating an incumbent requires a compelling rationale for change, just ask Poppy “It’s the economy, stupid” Bush about that… um, if you’re holding a seance, that is. Let me know what he says, if you do!
The One Weird Trick to Beating Status Quo Bias
The trick to beating the status quo bias is making the status quo look like a sure loss, thus making the change seem like the better option. We’ve had a front row seat, not to a hanging as Senator Hyde (R-Lynching) would’ve liked, but to Republican efforts to make it seem as if the government is not or cannot work. Let’s site some examples:
Immigration
There has been lots of loud and whinging criticism of Biden and the Democrats for having an open boarder, but when it comes to time to put their legislation where their mouth is, all they can do is stick their heads up each others asses like ostriches trying to hide from voter dissatisfaction. This attitude is best expressed by Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Assholes) when he famously remarked, Let me tell you, I’m not willing to do too damn much right now to help a Democrat and to help Joe Biden’s approval rating. I will not help the Democrats try to improve this man’s dismal approval ratings. I’m not going to do it. Why would I? And, of course, that legislation never passed.
They impeached the Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas. Of course, the GOP can’t do anything without shooting five or a dozen of their own members in the genitals, so it took two tries to get it done. And, they did all on trumped up charges that somehow Mayorkas is to blame for the push of the horrific conditions in other countries and the pull of the shining city on a hill.
It is all part and parcel of a general strategy to achieve these goals:
- RACIST FEAR MONGERING. They need to scare white people into thinking that they are going to be replaced or at least out voted by asylum seekers who are just lazy takers coming here to live off of the fruits of their hard labor that the Democrats are only too happy to give them just to buy their votes.
- SOWING CONFUSION. They have to keep the border and immigration as chaotic as possible so that no one can easily understand what is really happening. All they have to do is point and scream like Courtney Cox about the horrors, the HORRORS! happening on the border as the unwashed diseased terrorists flood across coming to do unspeakable harm to America because they hate our freedoms.
- PARALYZING THE FEDERAL RESPONSE. If they can actually stop the federal government from cogently implementing a policy by, I dunno, refusing to do anything other than sign short short short-term continuing resolutions to keep the government funded for a month or two at best and tie up departmental resources responding to their myriad long-term “investigations,” then they can say see? See? SEE?
Economy & inflation
Republicans are doing everything they can to distract from Biden’s economic achievements and focus on the few problems in the economy, like inflation. In the simplistic analysis that the GOP offers, inflation is bad and Biden is to blame, which, of course, no president is wholly responsible for inflation.
Because today is more important than the future and the past, voters pay attention to what is happening right now. Americans feel like their personal financial situation is either fine or better, but they believe that many people somewhere are struggling financially.
With the strong biases in economic perception polls, MAGA can maintain the false belief that the economy is performing poorly or much worse under Biden than it actually is. The truth is, using most metrics, the Biden economy is doing remarkably well.
One of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan was to bake the idea that Republicans were good at the economy and Democrats were bad at it into the American psyche. Trump and today’s GOP benefit greatly from this assumption. While the economy under Trump did well, it was a largely untroubled time in American history until #COVID19 came along, and then Trump showed is utter incompetence to manage anything other than grift.
Economic concerns remain the most important issue in the election, surpassing the next highest issue, immigration, by more than twice as much. Congressional Republicans are doing all they can to mire the economy in confusion and doom and gloom by dicking around with continuing resolutions and repeatedly pushing the government to the brink of shutdown.
Our current funding expires in September 2024, two months before the election. You know we’re going to be doing this dance all over again. The lack of predictability in government funding keeps the country, especially business, on tender hooks.
Roiling with partisan conflict
As long as MAGA can keep us roiling with partisan conflict over a myriad of social issues like abortion, book bannings and burnings, white privilege, fear of liberal protesters, and when all else fails, xenophobia, gun rights, and crime, they can paint the government as being ineffective.
It sets the stage for looking at the current mess in that Republicans have created in Washington and want to change it. The Republicans are gambling that the change will be in the White House and that the favorable senate election will shift the senate majority. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on how you look at it, it may mean that the House flips to the Dems in spite of gerrymandering and voter suppression and nullification efforts.
Status quo bias makes incumbency hard to beat. The only way to do it, according to behavioral economics, is to make the incumbent appear to be a failure by making the social milieu seem chaotic, muddled, and hopeless. By driving up negative perceptions of immigration, the economy, and social issues, the prospects of changing office holders, especially in the White House, seems like the better choice.

If you’ve enjoyed this analysis of Republican behavior on a national level, then consider doing one or all of the following:
- SHARE this blog post. More people need to know about the cynical machinations of Republicans to manipulate the perceptions of white people, especially, but all Americans. If you know someone who needs to know…
- LIKE or RATE this blog post. Nothing is as encouraging to seeing likes and ratings pop up on the posts, and it’s easy to do!
- COMMENT on the blog post, especially if you have an example of how Republicans are trying to make the nation seem like its heading in the wrong direction.
- FOLLOW the blog or subscribe to the email list!
Image Attribution
This image was generated using Poe’s StableDiffusionXL bot using the prompt, A ship changing course because of a storm on the horizon







“…fear of liberal protesters…” boo!, because we liberals are so scary… (I know; they believe we are even though we’re not the ones with glocks strapped to whatever. Huh.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
You remember the vicious skateboard-arm rioters that could only be stopped by a good guy with a gun. Who wouldn’t be afraid? And, those protesters blocking the streets inconveniencing citizens trying to go to Costco, why shouldn’t those citizens be encouraged to plow them over with their four-wheel drive trucks? Of course liberal protesters are scary, they just might have a legitimate point.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a perennial question: “Are you better off now than four years ago?” When trying to sway voters away from an incumbent, the thing to do is to paint a shiny but vague picture of, “How much better things were under _______.” The GOP has a long history of referring to some better past, whether it is the Trump administration, or the Good Old Days of the 1950s or 1850s (when there was still slavery and women had no rights). In a way, that turns the status quo bias on it’s head by referencing a previous status quo as the real normality.
That method also calls up the “Republicans are better for the economy” myth. They actually are better for some people’s economy, but that isn’t the poor, the average wage earner, or the small business owner. I’m reminded of this:
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.” – John Steinbeck
The GOP has been counting on that for a long time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Howdy Bob!
Given that upward mobility is a myth — people generally end up in similar financial and social circumstances as their parents — it is all part and parcel of the one percent and their political minions to bamboozle the American citizen into transferring their wealth to them. When you add on top of that that the good old days never existed, that pining for a past perfection that never was is just a propaganda tactic used by populist authoritarians, we understand why MAGA exists.
It’s a good point about how mythologizing the past into some golden age of perfection is a way of breaking status quo bias.
All of this also tells us how hard it is going to be to break the hold that MAGA has on white Americans.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 2 people
Then there are the other two myths that tend to hearken back to the good old days as being when they were true:
The Self Made Man [individualism bias]
Anybody can succeed if you just follow the rules and work hard. [ The poor are just lazy]
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve always found it interesting that we use the pejorative, lazy, for anyone who’s not doing what we think they ought to be doing. It justifies so many of the ills that we inflict on our fellow citizens or the misery that we condemn them to living in.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is interesting. After all, it isn’t even one of the cardinal sins — Oh, it is almost the same as “sloth”, but that is an action or state, not a character flaw, which is the pejorative implication of calling someone lazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
But calling someone lazy is blaming them for being so weak of character that they do not do whatever. It is making taking action a clear choice and giving it a value judgment. If you can blame the character, then you know god doesn’t love them as much as you, and you’ll likely be one of the chosen.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person