
Look carefully at his ear. Do you see any real damage? There’s a coupe of visible cuts to the upper pinna on the front and back of the helix, but there is no evidence of a bullet having done the damage.
Don’t let them gaslight you in the days and weeks ahead. THAT is the damage the Felonious Rapist Traitor sustained. Does it warrant the huge bandage he’s sporting at the RNC Convention?
With the Felonious Rapist Traitor having been shot at by what appears to be a real attempt at assassination no matter how inept the assassin and the Secret Service appear to have been, we should all be questioning our contributions to the violent and divisive rhetoric currently flying around the country.
Let’s take a look at how violent political rhetoric contributes to violence in our society in general and political violence specifically. We’ll want to take it in some kind of logical order, or at least what passes for logic in my brain:
- Political Violence is Perpetrated by the Right, Not the Left.
- Violent Political Rhetoric Leads to Political Violence
- Examples of Violent Rhetoric in Response to Trump Being Shot At
- The Republican National Convention is going Full MAGA
- Image Attribution
Political Violence is Perpetrated by the Right, Not the Left.
As reported by Reuters, while violent crime plummets to new lows in the US, political violence is soaring to new heights. You would never know either of these things if you get your news from social media, the legacy media, or conservative media outlets.
After the Felonious Rapist Traitor was shot at, we heard calls for the left to tone down its rhetoric about extremism on the right. You’ll also hear lip-service to the idea of conservatives toning down their rhetoric, too.
There are two BIG problems with all of this:
- BOTHSIDESISM. It is NOT both sides. It is the conservatives who are committing most of the acts of political violence. It isn’t even close. Read the Reuters article and let us know what you think in the comments.
- UNVERIDICALITY. Conservative complaints about unfair treatment of Trump, the 6 January Insurrectionists, white male Christians, and others are simply not true. Trump and the insurrectionists have been found guilty by a jury of his peers and indicted by state and federal grand juries. No one is stopping Christians, white male or otherwise, from practicing their sincerely held religious beliefs. We’re just asking them not to include the rest of us in their practice. The bottom line is, the conservatives are not being truthful. They are being purposefully deceptive.
[M]uch of today’s political violence is aimed at people – and most of the deadly outbursts tracked by Reuters have come from the right. Of the 14 fatal political attacks since the Capitol riot in which the perpetrator or suspect had a clear partisan leaning, 13 were right-wing assailants. One was on the left.
The recent violence coming from the right, Carnegie’s Kleinfeld said, “is focused on stopping people or ending people’s lives.”
Political violence in polarized U.S. at its worst since 1970s by NED PARKER and PETER EISLER on 9 August 2023 for Reuters
Don’t Let them Gaslight You about Political Violence
Don’t let them gaslight you by telling you. All of the problems in our political system have instigated and promoted by the conservatives in our country to overthrow the will of the people as expressed through our elections. It is as simple as that. If we’d let it alone, the system would work just fine, and protect all of us from the conservative extremists.
Violent Political Rhetoric Leads to Political Violence
While we’ve all been thinking it since the Felonious Rapist Traitor slithered down the gold veneer escalator spouting hatred of Browns, Blacks, and women, we have been pretty good about not saying it. To be clear, if we’re being honest, most of us have entertained a thought that included Trump and assassination in it.
In many ways, it would put us all out of his narcissistic miserable insecurity and save us a lot of heartache and grief. But, wishing harm and death upon people is not acceptable. We make our choices known with the ballot, not the bullet. It is one of the better features of democracy.
We’ve seen it in action at several key moments in American history. The Great Depression started in 1929, but we patiently waited until the 1932 elections to change the ineffective government of Hoover for that of Roosevelt. We waited for the 1968 elections to make our displeasure over the prosecution of the war in Viet Nam known and ended up with Nixon in a remarkably parallel scenario to what we’re facing now, but that is fodder for another blog post.
Our culture is deeply democratic. We believe strongly in the making our voices heard through the ballot. It is probably why none of the white nationalists attempts at starting a “race war” by mass shootings of Blacks and Browns has never worked. It is only the white nationalists who don’t believe in democracy. But, again, a topic for another blog post.
Prejudiced Norm Theory and Disparagement Humor, the Root in the Surge of Political Violence on the Right
Let’s reach back to one of the first posts on Ye Olde Blogge to tell the tale of prejudiced norm theory and disparagement humor:
Thomas Ford has researched the effects of disparagement humor extensively and has developed prejudiced norm theory. The theory states that for people who are relatively high in prejudice against the targeted group, disparagement humor will increase the tolerance for prejudicial acts against that target group. That is a fancy obfuscationist scientific academic way of saying that telling racist or sexist or racist sexist jokes coarsens society and makes behaving in a discriminatory or prejudicial way more accepted. In other words, it breeds assholes. It’s an asshole magnet.
Second Amendment solution jokes will be heard by people prone to gun violence as giving them permission to commit gun violence. They feel understood and encouraged by such statements and the people making them. We needn’t do a granular review of all of the ways that Trump and MAGA Republicans have encouraged violence among their supporters, do we? If you have a particularly egregious example, please share it in the comments. I’d love to hear about it.
But, wait a minute, what about liberal, including your own, Jack, responses to Trump being “shot” at and injured?
Examples of Violent Rhetoric in Response to Trump Being Shot At

We’ll run through a few examples, including one of my own, thanks to loyal reader, Ali Redford, for calling me out on my own questionable rhetoric. It couldn’t’ve happened to a more deserving fellow. I’ve been waiting for someone to take this shot for the past eight year. It is the kind of thing you say in the heat of the moment and only makes things worse. It never makes things better. There is a big difference between thinking these things and articulating them into actual words for the world to read and hear.
We get this one from the troll, mosckerr, Fight Fight Fight. Pelosi Schiff and Nadler attempted to impeach Trump over his refusal to intervene in the Ukraine/Russian war. Bunk on the SS Federal bureaucrat corruption which attempted to pull another Kennedy Kennedy King assassinations & Bay of Pigs — Vietnam war of imperialism. They are the type of unthinking extremist that such violent rhetoric is likely to push over the edge. They are who MAGA Republicans are counting on to commit violent political acts.
Ant is what led to Tenacious D cancelling their concert tour after co-founder, Kyle Gass, made this understandable, but unfortunate joke on stage when asked to make a birthday wish, Don’t miss Trump next time. Jack Black did the only thing to do is in this situation: stop everything and focus on the problem. Kyle Gass isn’t a terrible irredeemable person for having had such a lapse in judgment, but it is a learning moment for us all.
We are responsible for our words and their effects on those who hear them. We know what making crass racial, sexual, and political jokes does to the world we live in. We know the difference between crassness and good taste, too
Create the World You Want to Live In
Okay, “Create the world you want to live in,” is a bit too Pollyannaish, since Hitler created the world he wanted to live in, it does communicate the idea that we should endeavor to live our ideals. It implies that those ideals are based on kindness and respect for the rights of others and all living things. So, keep the jokes about the death of Donald Trump to your own self.
The Republican National Convention is going Full MAGA
The Republicans know that they cannot win a high turnout election. They know they have to do everything in their power to subvert the Democratic turnout and pump up their base, thus, the Black Flag conspiracy theories about Trump being shot at.
Corey Comperatore and the two severely wounded audience members are not paid actors; they actually exist, and they should receive all of our sympathy and good will.
So far at the RNC, we’ve had a good example of not being able to teach an old dog new spots. We’ve had a chorus of the same-old same-old:
- DAY 1: Maddog Greene and all her hateful divisive stylings were featured with her anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, focused on the scapegoat, trans-Americans. Things didn’t get better with NC gubernatorial candidate, Mark Some Folks Need Killing Robinson, mostly lied about Trump and the economy, and Charlie Separation of Church and State is Made up by Secular Humanists Kirk lied about how much Trump had helped the yutes.
- DAY 2: Republican voters are urged to FIGHT for Trump with a wink, a nod, and nudge to the camera. Followed by the apologia tour of the also-rans, including protest-vote favorite, Nikki Haley. They were all careful to make a distinction between good and bad immigrants, you know like Haley’s parents and JD Vance’s wife, Usha Chilukuri, who are good when they are for Trump.
So, yes, it does sound like the Republican Party has learned its lesson about overheated violent rhetoric, and that lesson is, “more, please.” They all know the connection between acts of political violence and violent rhetoric. They know that there are people out there like Crooks and mocskerr who will be triggered and act on their words. They’re planning on it.
They know how people react to random acts of extreme violence, too. ly They are hoping that it spirals out of control. They are banking on it.
When They Tell You Who They Are, Believe Them
The question is, have we as an electorate learned our lesson? Have we learned that the only way to stop the oligarchs and fascists in the Republican Party is through overwhelming defeat at the polls? Have we learned that the only way to save our democracy is through voting for the party and candidates who support democracy and the country? Have learned the Great Civics Lesson from 2016?

If you thought the use of Prejudiced Norm Theory to link the rising acts of political violence to violent conservative rhetoric was helpful, please consider doing one or all of the following:
- SHARE this blog post with someone you think needs to see it.
- LIKE or RATE the post using the buttons at the top or bottom of the article.
- COMMENT on the post telling us what you think of the connection between Trump being shot at and the violent rhetoric and acts coming almost exclusively from the right.
- FOLLOW the blog or join our burgeoning email list
Image Attribution
The image was taken from the Fox News story, PHOTO GALLERY: Assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. I cropped it and blew it up to focus on the injury to Trump’s ear… or lack thereof.





I dunno about the latter…I kinda got into an argument with an idiot (I know, I know wrestling pigs and all that, but this guy was a walking talking example of Murc’s Law) because he was insisting that the media pile-on on Biden wasn’t really happening, by posting a few links to where outlets had mentioned Trumps lies in the aftermath of the debate, and besides, he was concerned and just looking for information and where did he have to go but the mass media? The bit is in the comments here if anyone is interested.
A little google-fu found that in the last month the NYT and Washington Post alone had put out over 8000 articles that hit on ‘Biden Step down’ and barely 900 ‘Trump debate lies’ (actual ratio was 9.2 Biden articles to 1 Trump)
There are some enormously heavy thumbs, elbows, feet and cartoon ‘1000 lbs’ weights on the scale for #BidenSoOld.
Even today, the NYT Opinions page managed to find one more spot for someone saying Biden ‘must step down’ amidst the GOP Convention and VP pick pieces. That someone being:
The podcast name is [chef’s kiss]. This is someone who gets column inches in the alleged ‘paper of record’ during the most consequential US presidential election since 1860.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bruce!
I think Mitch Romney got it right, and I’ll paraphrase here, when he said, “profits are people, too, my friend” and the John “Money Doesn’t Corrupt” Roberts Court granted profits equal rights status under the Constitution with Citizens United. If the for-profit media is going to keep the profits coming using an outdated business model that is not keeping up with a changing media and technology environment, then they have to keep Trump — the most unviable and least qualified candidate in the history of politics — a viable candidate. Even during the coverage of Trump being shot at, which should’ve shoved every other political story off of the front page for 24 hours, you had stories on #BidenSoOld.
Media narrative has tremendous influence on elections, but it isn’t the only influence. The best the Republicans can hope for is to keep people home and not vote for Biden and Democrats. They cannot hope to actually grow their vote totals.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
I’ll have to look up the source of the quote, but the gist is that when the aggressor calls for peace in the middle of the fight, it’s a trick.
Nobody except a full blown sociopath engaged in conquest for the glory of it ever admits to being the aggressor. It is always self defense, or necessary punishment of evil doers.
“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.” Barry Goldwater
Violent rhetoric from Republicans is not new.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
The white supremacists of the country have always been violent no matter what name they call themselves. It is the only way to keep the racial hierarchy in order. The forces of oligarchy have always coopted the police to enforce their privileges. According to the Steven Pinker the reason we have so many guns in the country now is because we didn’t disarm the populace after the revolution when most European countries were, allowing the citizenry equal access to the means of police violence as the police have had. The idea that in a true democracy that you cannot trust your government is preposterous. The very tyranny they claim to be guarding against is what they are bringing to the rest of us.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
It helps to recall that the state militias in our early history were generally defined as all able-bodied white men of fighting age, and the primary perceived threats were slave uprisings and attacks by native Americans (or, more often, them attempting to defend themselves). Guns in this country have been a racial issue from the start. Still, that distrust of government is something that seems more recent. The authors of the Second Amendment clearly did not intend to endorse personal gun ownership for the purpose of rebellion. Tracing the selling of that idea would, I think, takes us straight to The Lost Cause rhetoric.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
That’s a good point about the role guns have played in our systemic racism. I’ve heard it said that militias played a prominent role in catching and returning runaway slaves.
Everything in America traces its roots to slavery and white nationalism. Maybe this is a moment when we make some real progress against it. Even though, it doesn’t feel like it.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can hope, and do what we can.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
n
Trump has been an awakening for many Americans. He taught us how electoral politics work, again. He’s taught us about our role as voters in a democracy. And, he’s forcing us to make a conscious choice: do we want oligarchy and white nationalism or do we want an egalitarian democracy?
In some ways it doesn’t matter if the choice is conscious or unconscious choice. At some level, white people knew when they chose Nixon, Reagan, Poppy, W, and Trump, they were choosing the systemic racist status quo. Nixon just co-opted Wallace’s open racism and sugar coated it with dog whistles. The rest of the Republican candidates followed suit. The sugar coating made making the choice easy because it excluded the choice. You could engage in some cognitive dissonance and claim that you were voting for law and order. The dissonance tells you that at some level, you know you’re making a choice you don’t like.
Hopefully, Trump has sucked all the sugar coating off of that racist candy and we’re left with the bitter truth: we’re choosing white supremacy and misogyny. How happy are you to be doing so, so openly? The hope is no.
If the Republicans can distract us with Biden’s age and make-believe issues like crime, debt, and inflation, then the cognitive dissonance makes it easier to vote for open naked racism and misogyny.
Here’s hoping that white Americans won’t be fooled again. But, we don’t have the best track record in that regard.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
If nothing else, T’s acceptance speech (which even the NYT scored as 0 on a 0-10 scale), and the rest of the convention, has clarified the choice. There was a distinct lack of sugar coating except for the hard core MAGAs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And with Biden likely to withdraw now, it is going to be very hard to get people to the polls to vote for an alternative. This is likely to be a MAGA election. With the base energized by the “assassination” attempt and a much weakened Democratic candidate, Trump’s odds of winning have just increased substantially.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
I’m finding it more difficult to imagine how the “dump Joe” crowd can’t see the damage they are doing.
AOC is a keen observer, and has been talking to them: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/7/19/2255746/-Identifying-Media-Misinformation-AOC-Says-Out-Loud-What-We-Have-All-Been-Thinking?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
Everyone has to know they are damaging Biden’s chance of election and his successor’s chances success, too. It has to be that the latest round thinks that they are facing a sure loss with Biden, and it’s worth taking a chance on pushing him out and letting someone else run.
I have to think that they know something we don’t like some internal party polling or something.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I feel very frustrated when they say he can’t win because they are not saying how they know that, just treating it as if it should be obvious to everyone, and those who don’t see it are being stubborn or stupid. So, I keep asking, “According to whom, on what evidence and data?” “He’s too old.” or “He looks weak.” isn’t enough.
And, that bit of “looking weak” gets me to the perception of strength and weakness. If someone takes Donald Trump as the definition of strength (of which you and I know he is the exact opposite), then Biden, and all the suggested alternatives look weak. I have to wonder whether these people are really thinking that what we need is our own populist strong man, a sort of slightly right of center Trump clone. They would not be thinking of a truly left wing one, a real socialist one.
LikeLike
Howdy Bob!
That’s it exactly. I don’t think anyone is thinking. I think they are all reacting, and now that the snowball has started gathering moss, they feel more urgency and fear than ever but don’t know where it is really coming from or where it is going.
As far as I can tell, there are four types of folks on the #BidenSoOld train: (1) The Lloyd Doggetts who have been so freed from any feelings of responsibility or influence by spending 25 years on the Democratic backbench of the House and doing nothing more than collecting their salary that they just say whatever and never think it is going to go anywhere because who the hell listens to Lloyd Doggett?. There may be just one of them. It may just be Lloyd. (2) The donor class who is used to buying the political outcomes they want and not organizing or executing them. They found themselves the perfect storm of knee-jerk reaction, polling, and media coverage and started reacting. (3) The fearful and panicked who listened to the growing chorus of news reports keeping the story alive and got shook. And (4) those that see personal gain to be made out of getting the candidate of their choice on the ticket.
What none of the groups are doing are thinking it through. They don’t have a plan. They are not making a plan. They are reacting.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
If anybody involved is thinking, if only in terms of personal interests (like not having a tax on unrealized capital gains) and prejudices (The country is just not ready for a President who is a woman, and a woman of color.), it is the donor class. They prefer candidates who are more like them (rich, white, and male) to whom they do not have to explain their world view and needs. Still, even they don’t appear to have an actual plan. If the Democrats could offer them a candidate who is a tech or private capital billionaire, they would be orgasmic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
AOC made an interesting point in her video talk. No one who really wants to be president, wants the nomination in this way. It puts them too far behind and in too difficult of a situation. It’s, literally, a no win situation for them. I hadn’t thought of it like that. Still, I’m surprised that there isn’t someone out there who thinks of themselves as a knight in shining armor willing to be the Democratic knight in shining armor and do a bit of self promotion.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
There may be one, but they would have to have big donor support, to the tune of a very fast 100-200 million $ to get it off the ground, and also get at least 300 delegates to sign their candidacy petition. And, if a large majority of Biden’s pledged delegates stick with Harris, she’s got it in the bag.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Since most if not all of Biden’s delegates would’ve stuck with him in the roll call vote, I don’t see how or why they wouldn’t stick to Harris given his endorsement and the moment of crisis the party and country faces. Given the inability to actually organize a #BidenSoOld challenge that could actually work, I don’t see anyone able to organize a convention challenge to Harris that would be a viable threat.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neither do I. And, nobody with Presidential ambitions wants to get themselves stuck in a half-assed, improvised failure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is looking pretty good for the party rallying around Harris, unlike Humphrey in 68.
Jack
LikeLike
It is looking very good. Any nay-sayers (except maybe Joe Manchin) are conspicuously quiet. A PAC for never-Trump Republicans created by Nikki Haley for her campaign has endorsed Kamala and donated. The “Double Haters” are freed to get excited and vote.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s still hard for me to believe that anyone could look at the incredible first term of Biden and all the successes he’s had with social policy and legislation, managing the economy, and foreign policy, and not think he deserves four more years. It just is beyond conception. It’s even harder to think that anyone could look at Biden and even consider voting for Trump.
It goes back to some of the fundamental assumptions of behavioral economics, people use their immediate context to evaluate decisions. We don’t take a big picture approach. It is always, what have you done for me lately. Even that doesn’t explain anyone but MAGA voting Trump.
My biggest fear is that the Dems won’t be able to get Harris introduced to the country quickly and cleanly enough and the Republicans will orchestrate a smear and disinformation campaign against her.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
The GOP had the smear and disinformation campaign against Harris up and running weeks or months ago. It is hard to see how it could get more vile or intense.
A good example of that pattern in behavior economics is in the talk of inflation. I I don’t like how much I just spent at the grocery store, inflation is out of control and the president did it. What many people are really demanding is deflation, a condition that economists and the Federal Reserve fear at least as much as inflation, partly because that spiral leads to recession or worse, and unemployment, which is the subject of the FR’s prime directives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Using your grocery and gas bills as anchors and hindsight bias as a filter, maybe it explains Trumps support? That and cognitive dissonance to get around the fascism?
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is part of it. In regard to inflation, not understanding that it is primarily caused by some shift in the balance between supply and demand, over which Presidents, and Congressional budget writers have little or no control, and the Federal Reserve only very blunt tools to address, topped off by corporate greed, is the major reason it is a political issue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They certainly seem to believe they know something the rest of us don’t. This morning, one of the more sane commentators on NPR mentioned that the Joe Must Go people are referring to a poll that found that 2/3 of Democrats say Joe should (or, was it, must?) drop out. As with all polls, the devil is in the details of the sampling, method of contact, and framing of the questions. Getting the result you want is almost trivially easy.
One of the themes we are hearing is “Biden looks weak.” He doesn’t look weak to me, but I’ve seen his strengths for a long time and they are still there. But, if Donald Trump has become the example of what strong looks like (Which he is a notion he is mainly selling, although as you and I know he is anything, or everything but genuinely strong.) then I don’t see anybody in the Democrats’ vaunted “Deep Bench” who is ready to go toe to toe with Trump in pretending to be strong, who can be a left-of-center, or only slightly right-of-center Populist Strong Man. We don’t currently have a revolutionary socialist movement to produce one.
What would Joe Biden need to see in order to step down? I think he would need to see a real plan to name his replacement, unify the party behind that person, and a plan for victory by that fully unified and un-distracted party. Otherwise, I think he would feel he was betraying the voters who choose him in the primary.
That’s another thing I hear when the primary result is brought up to the Dump Joe people, a dismissal of those votes with a “That was then, this is now.” attitude. It bothers me. I have the idea that a party named Democrat should be practicing democracy, not just preaching it. I don’t like my vote being thrown away so lightly. Neither do these members of a core block of the party:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/7/19/2255784/-1-400-Black-women-leaders-and-allies-speak-out-in-support-of-POTUS-Joe-Biden-s-nomination?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
If 2016 taught us anything, or should’ve taught us anything, it should’ve taught us how to read polls: (1) Not all polls are created equally. We need to analyze the sampling and methodology of every poll. And (2) no single poll has much meaning. The real power of polling comes in the aggregation of polls. Fine, you have a poll that reports X. Does it agree with other polls or is it an outlier?
FiveThirtyEight has an interesting analysis of the #BidenSoOld group in the party. It is a little dated, already ten days old. But, it notes that far more elected Democrats have voiced support for Biden (89 to 37) than have called on him to step aside. The press, of course, focuses heavily on the #BidenSoOld group. The force Biden out forces are largely moderate, white, and from more at-risk districts and states.
I would be happier if the #BidenSoOld folks had caucused and came out with a unified statement outlining a plan for transitioning to another candidate with a list of individuals committed to being the nominee. This feels extremely half-baked to me, and the stakes are too high for just willy-nilly running along the edge of a cliff with all of the incumbent pushing and shoving that goes on. Someone is going over the side. Our democracy does not deserve to suffer death by selfie (People walking themselves over the edge of a cliff to get a better angle on a picture. It’s a thing. It’s even a CDC category.)
From what I can tell, it’s starting to sound inevitable that he drop out. I thought the #COVID19 thing would give him cover to do it. It still might. It’s his second time, complications are more likely. He’s taken paxlovid, which gives him a high chance of relapse. It could still bite him in the ass. Harris has finally begun to start considering the possibility that she might could maybe take over as candidate and might could maybe sort of need a skeletal suggestion of a campaign. Maybe.
I don’t know that an open convention would be a disaster for the Democrats. It would draw an audience. If they could coalesce around a candidate, even Biden, they could come out stronger than they went in. The RNC has been a yawner with low viewership and no change in Republican rhetoric.
Huzzah!
Jack
https://abcnews.go.com/538/democrats-doubting-biden-common/story?id=111812962
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m reminded that, “Without context, words and facts have no meaning.” [Gregory Bateson, though I may have misquoted slightly fro memory]. The breathless news reader exclaiming, or the screaming headline, that 35 Democrat MOCs have told Biden to step aside is a very different experience than if it is “35 out of 212”, or “x Senators out of 50”. The “Biden must go” is not a majority position by a long shot. Canvassers get comments like, “I’d vote for Joe if he was in a coma.” The Black and Hispanic caucuses in the House are solid backing Biden. Can you imagine them being told that their people’s primary votes don’t count anymore? So, why is Joe hanging in there? He’s been playing the game for a long time. He knows the difference between polls and reality. And, he is as loyal to his voters as they are to him. And, he knows a minority movement or freak out when he sees one.
BTW As of the headline this morning, the NYT Editorial Board has flipped from “Biden Too Old” to “Trump Is Unfit.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
It’s about time the NYT quit promoting Trump as a qualified candidate. Like nine years over due.
People underestimate Biden all of the time, but he’s savvy enough to have read the situation for what it is. While AOC’s video really put it into perspective, undoubtedly, Biden knew all of that already. The only proper response to Biden’s debate performance was to double down on #TrumpSoUnfit.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I just read that Biden has withdrawn from the race and endorsed Harris.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
He did. One of the ways I’m looking at it is that they realized that if the “Chicken Littles” didn’t have a plan, somebody had to, and that there was no way to bring those people on board except by making the change. He may also have been told not to go out in crowds and catching the virus again. So, he stays in the WH minding the store, and Kamala gets to pick a running mate who will be young, male, and white (or, possibly Hispanic) and very good in the attack dog role.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Biden read what AOC did, and realized it was up to him to develop the plan. What a fucking leader. I am just humbled, but also really grieving his candidacy, and privileged to be a witness to such vision, discipline, and grace.
Jesus, Bob, what it must have taken to come to this decision. I’m just stunned.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
I imagine that Joe would say that next to his grieving of lost loved ones, this is the hardest and most painful thing he has ever done, or close to it.
I keep hearing mention of a poll in which 2/3 of Democrats said Biden had to drop out. Every time I hear that, I think how easy it is to construct a poll to get the desired result, and I have not seen any link to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t seen the poll either. And flippantly or glibly answering a pollster isn’t the same as voting. It was the firestorm of the moment. Had Biden not realized how the dates of the convention and ballot access were squeezing the party, he probably could’ve weathered the firestorm.
However, a sizeable portion of the electorate didn’t want to see Biden-Trump 2.0. I can’t understand it, though, given Biden’s accomplishments in office. Trump, yes. He is wholly unfit for office and should not be treated as anything other than a pariah and ostracized.
Biden’s reelection should’ve been a no-brainer. At least Biden’s sacrifice brings a new energy and respect to the man. I haven’t seen how it is being covered in MAGA world, but the independent soccer-mom and hockey-dad voter should be impressed by it and will give Harris a look.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
The problem of the voters who were simply bored of having the same old (and old) candidates has been solved. There are at least anecdotal reports of people who had not planned to vote getting interested, especially among the disaffected of Gen-Z.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bob!
I think this is one of those silver lining moments. If it had come about any other way, it probably wouldn’t be as beneficial to anyone.
I still can’t believe that anyone treats Trump with anything other than scorn and derision and makes any attempt to make him seem a viable candidate.
Jack
LikeLiked by 1 person
History may (let us pray so) record this as the most brilliant move, including the timing, in Joe’s political career.
With Trump, it has always been all or nothing, disgust or adulation, horror or worship, a blue pill or a red pill. I keep remembering recent interviews with some of the staff and producers on The Apprentice, regretting having created this monster.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And, doesn’t this, BITE the, Republicans’ supprt of Amendment Two on the ASS??? It’s superficial, only knicked a couple of veins, otherwise, he would’ve, started, bleeding, out. And, this will, help him gain more, sympathy votes in November, I’m sure, making it, an, EASY win for the, Republican in the, presidential, office.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Howdy Taurus!
Republicans are so used to talking out of their asses about the Second Amendment that this doesn’t even rank with the mass shootings in the States. Our news cycles turn over so fast that the only reminder of it we’ll have next week is Trump’s ridiculously large bandage that he’ll insist on wearing and the sir! Sir! Stories about very large men with tears in their eyes asking him how he survived something that no one else has ever survived before.
This no more guarantees Trump’s victory than #BidenSoOld guaranteed Biden’s loss.
That’s one of the things that makes the Republican insistence that truth and fact don’t matter so ridiculous.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
I dunno, when the then #3 Republican in the House, Steve Scalise got shot by a maniac with an AR15, and needed multiple surgeries and months of rehabilitation, he still remained in the ‘thoughts and prayers‘ camp.
The Republican support of mass murder is, by now, rigid Holy Dogma for them. They have long resembled the violent outcasts in Zardoz, worshipping the Great God Gun more than anything else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Howdy Bruce!
It’s the price of freedom that Steve Scalise was only too happy to have paid. It is the same cognitive dissonance that saw many of the faithful deny #COVID19 with their dying breath as it took them to meet their maker, who undoubtedly had trouble suppressing the snicker at their fool ass.
Huzzah!
Jack
LikeLike
I’m reminded of the old joke about the preacher who drowned in the flood, standing before God.
“What were you expecting? I sent you a shutdown, I sent you masks, I sent you social distancing rules, I sent you a miracle vaccine”
LikeLiked by 1 person
God helps those who help themselves, right?
And, render unto Caesar that which is Caeser’s, meaning pay your taxes and follow the rules of your secular government, God understands and won’t send you to hell for it.
LikeLike