To add to the trifecta of stupid from yesterday, Fox News offers us this gem from their very own Dagen McDowell who co-hosts Outnumbered. Apparently, they were trying to work out the intricacies of the Ol’ Pussy Grabber being interviewed by Robert Mueller. You know how it is a felony to lie the the FBI or special counsel. So, it obviously is an attempt to trick the Ol’ Pussy Grabber into perjuring himself by asking him questions.
As Jessica Tarlov astutely pointed out, he could try not lying. But, of course, the Ol’ Pussy Grabber can’t not lie because he’s a pathological liar who believes that he is a stable genius and will outsmart us all and exceptions will be made for him and all the other narcissistic gaslighting bullshit that he tries to foist off on us that a third of the country accepts as gospel.
Seriously, it’s not me, right? It’s them, right? It’s gotta be them who are just being led like a bull by a scrotal ring as they try to justify… what was she trying to justify again? I can’t even imagine what she thinks she’s justifying… the Ol’ Pussy Grabber shouldn’t talk to the special counsel because he’s guilty? Because he’s allowed to collude with a foreign power? Because he didn’t collude with a foreign power? It is like walking into a fucking kaleidoscope fun-house mirrorred twilight zone episode thingee.
This is motivated reasoning taken to the nose bleed depths that can only aggravate your vertigo. Are they trying to get us to give up because they are so hopelessly stupid? Are they going to sneak past us as we literally roll on the ground laughing our asses off at them?
Is it humanly possible to be so unaware of what you’re saying? This has got to be some kind of Andy Kaufman–Tony Clifton act where everyone on the other side is going to walk out onto stage eventually and report that it was just a ruse to teach as all a Great Civics Lesson and save our democracy from ourselves, right? Because, otherwise, we’re in deep deep trouble here.
Reblogged this on cabbagesandkings524 and commented:
Calico Jack finds more flawed (but motivated) reasoning, now about the risk to DJT in being asked questions under oath.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps the young lady from Fox “News” would benefit from reviewing the decision in Miranda v. Arizona. Of course, it is just as impossible for DJT to remain silent as it is for him to tell (or even recognize) the truth, or remember what he said ten minutes ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person